On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:48:33PM -0400, Brian Padalino wrote:
> >
> >In any case, in reading the associated python code, I noticed that the
> >data sent over the USB seems to have to be in multiples of 128, but it
> >also seemed to imply that it had to be multiples of 512. The current
> >padding
On 5/18/07, Brett L. Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm involved with very lossy links and low signal strengths using gmsk
and dqpsk and would like to add a layer of reed-solomon encoding in
place of the current CRC check.
My plan was to use reed solomon in a standard (255,223) configuration
I'm involved with very lossy links and low signal strengths using gmsk
and dqpsk and would like to add a layer of reed-solomon encoding in
place of the current CRC check.
My plan was to use reed solomon in a standard (255,223) configuration
and use PKSC#7 padding in 223 byte blocks where the last N
