Agreed :)
On 28.08.2015 18:16, Jeon wrote:
> Daer Marcus,
>
> Thank you for your detailed answer. Now I feel I am getting to it...
> But, not fully, yet :)
>
> What I've said 'one' in the previous post is, you can understand with
> the figure:
> http://i.imgur.com/QG5uryH.png
> I've posted the sam
Daer Marcus,
Thank you for your detailed answer. Now I feel I am getting to it... But,
not fully, yet :)
What I've said 'one' in the previous post is, you can understand with the
figure:
http://i.imgur.com/QG5uryH.png
I've posted the same figure in another thread some days ago.
Anyway, 'one' I m
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:09:55 +0200
> From: Marcus M?ller
> Hi Jeon,
> > But I don't think that GNU Radio uses 100 percent (= one) of CPU
> > capability.
> Well, that obviously depends on what you /do /with GNU Radio.
> Generally, GNU Radio scales pretty well, so I'm going to reply with:
>
Hi Jeon,
> But I don't think that GNU Radio uses 100 percent (= one) of CPU
> capability.
Well, that obviously depends on what you /do /with GNU Radio.
Generally, GNU Radio scales pretty well, so I'm going to reply with:
GNU Radio tries to consume as much CPU as possible. There's limiting
factors,
I've learned that sum of runtime usage values of all blocks should be and
is one.
But I don't think that GNU Radio uses 100 percent (= one) of CPU capability.
And I think that 'one' is a portion to the capability which is allowed and
allocated to the GNU Radio.
In order to calculate runtime usag
