Yes, for sure. That's the property of short training sequence I think.
In SORA and my code we have already saved frequency domain values of the
short training and long training sequence with which we correlate the
incoming samples and look for sharp peaks and then count the peaks.
For my code it
I don't know SORA; SC requires that one of the preamble symbols are
symmetric in time domain. Is that the case?
On 11/08/2016 01:00 PM, sumitstop wrote:
> Hello Marcus,
>
> Thanks for the informative reply.
>
> Right now I was using Cross-correlation based method for my preamble search.
> It wo
Hello Marcus,
Thanks for the informative reply.
Right now I was using Cross-correlation based method for my preamble search.
It works good, but I have not tested it in real-time, so I am unsure about
its performance.
However I checked gr-ieee 802.11 implementation, which is another
implementa
Hi Sumit,
well, being a part of the industry, I can certainly say that GNU Radio
happily encourages usage of Schmidl&Cox (SC).
If you look at it closely, SC is pretty cool because, heck, timing AND
frequency correction with just two training symbols?! The paper was von
1997, which means that any
Hello,
I was going thru the implementation of ofdm_sync_sc_cfb_impl.cc. As it says,
it implements
[1] Schmidl, T.M. and Cox, D.C., "Robust frequency and timing
synchronization for OFDM", Communications, IEEE Transactions on, 1997.
with modified normalization.
However I was wondering that in i
