Hello, just an update for the official i500 spec whitepaper.
http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/116757/NVIDIA_i500_whitepaper_FINALv3.pdf
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Lin HUANG wrote:
> Well, for this case, is the solution with multiple RF modules plus one BB
> module OK? The BB modules for d
Well, for this case, is the solution with multiple RF modules plus one BB
module OK? The BB modules for different bands are almost same, right? Or do
you think a very wide band RF module plus a BB module is better? I'm not
expert on chipset design. What's your opinion?
There are different levels o
> In consumer electronic products, ASIC is always the best
performance-price choice.
Even with LTE you have to deal with 12 freq. bands?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Lin HUANG wrote:
> ASIC is always the best performance-price choice.
___
Discuss
Thanks for your opinion sharing. I'll read the links you gave.
I'm thinking that the advantage of software radio is its flexibility but
this flexibility is constrained by standards of telecommunication. I mean
when you create a telecom device you have to follow standard, so that less
space is left
Hi, Lin,
According to Icera's previous product lines, there is no any
documentation for instruction sets. I think their market is the same as
Qualcomm's, i.e. cell phone manufactorurs. TI has a digital signal
processor C6670, which targets base stations. It contains some
coprocessors, e.g. turbo e
Hi Albert,
If that is as you said, Icera won't open the instruction set and develop
tool, and all the software are encrypted. Then this chipset is not suitable
for people like GNU Radio guys to DIY something. So, what is the major
market of this chipset? Cellphone manufactor? Let them to develop m
According to this web page:
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/30024-icera-i500-is-programmable-lte
And the features of Icera's previous platforms:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-icera-products.html
On the photo from CES, Icera i500 platform has 8 processors on it, each
one contains its own
Can anybody explain the difference between this softmodem and other
existing wireless baseband programmable processors?
My understanding is that, also as Marcus mentioned, it provides more
flexibility by this array of special CPUs instead of the prefixed
functions/blocks, within this chip. Otherwis
I don't have high hopes for this specific chip - I guess the IC will
be hard to buy and the modem feature on built devices will hard to
hack, lacking source and documentation for its drivers, just as
Android devices are hard for cyanogenmod developers to hack with.
But these news do give some
I don't have high hopes for this specific chip - I guess the IC will be
hard to buy and the modem feature on built devices will hard to hack,
lacking source and documentation for its drivers, just as Android devices
are hard for cyanogenmod developers to hack with.
But these news do give some hope
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:08 AM, est wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/07/nvidia-i500-soft-modem/
>
> From Icera's previous products list, looks like the bandwidth is 5~10MHz
>
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-icera-products.html
>
> Is it possible that Tegra 4 is yet another cheap SDR
http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/07/nvidia-i500-soft-modem/
>From Icera's previous products list, looks like the bandwidth is 5~10MHz
http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-icera-products.html
Is it possible that Tegra 4 is yet another cheap SDR solution like rtlsdr?
12 matches
Mail list logo
