On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Shalabh Jain wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Tom Rondeau
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Shalabh Jain
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I am having a weird problem during the
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Shalabh Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Tom Rondeau
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Shalabh Jain
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am having a weird problem during the gnuradio installation. It seems
>>> like an issue with treatment
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Shalabh Jain
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am having a weird problem during the gnuradio installation. It seems
>> like an issue with treatment of floating point values by the machine. What
>> concerns me is the
On 02/01/12 07:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>
>
> The variability is something to think about, though. I wonder if the
> precision of a 32-bit float is off by just enough that it's causing
> non-repeatable values.
>
Does our QA structure use randomized test vectors, or fixed ones? If
it's fixed test
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Shalabh Jain wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a weird problem during the gnuradio installation. It seems
> like an issue with treatment of floating point values by the machine. What
> concerns me is the variability across different runs..
>
> During the make check s
Hello,
I am having a weird problem during the gnuradio installation. It seems like
an issue with treatment of floating point values by the machine. What
concerns me is the variability across different runs..
During the make check step, one of the tests throws an error asserting that
the complex t
