On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> I've noticed that as well, and we need to fix it. I believe it's a
>> bug. Not sure if it's in libbladeRF or gr-osmosdr, but we're on it.
>
> OK, great to hear.
>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Huh?
Hi,
> Hi Ralph,
>
> I've noticed that as well, and we need to fix it. I believe it's a
> bug. Not sure if it's in libbladeRF or gr-osmosdr, but we're on it.
OK, great to hear.
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
Huh?! Early adopters we are, guess this is normal :-)
Is there are dedicated mailin
Hi Ralph,
I've noticed that as well, and we need to fix it. I believe it's a
bug. Not sure if it's in libbladeRF or gr-osmosdr, but we're on it.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Brian
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not exactly the perfect list for it, bu
Hi,
Not exactly the perfect list for it, but as the specialists are all here in
this list, it somehow should fit :)
When using gqrx with the BladeRF I observe that tuning takes "ages". Every
entered or changed frequency digit takes almost one second to be accepted,
and I mean to remember that dir
