On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jane Chen wrote:
> Thank you so much for your reply. I would like to make sure I don't
> misunderstand what you mentioned. Do you mean that I can choose a
> decimation factor less than 320 (64M/200k) (without considering the 6dB
> droop at the passband edges at t
e the decimation factor lower
to see what the differences are between them.
Thank you,
Jane
From: Johnathan Corgan
To: Jane Chen
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 6:45:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] decimation rate of GSM
200
2009/2/4 Jane Chen :
> I have a question about the decimation rate of GSM (channel is 200kHz wide).
>
> I search the decimation rate of GSM for GNURadio on the Google. I got some
> information from
> http://www.segfault.net/gsm/The_Beginners_Guide_to_analyzing_GSM_data_in_MatLab.pdf
>
> However,
Hi all,
I have a question about the decimation rate of GSM (channel is 200kHz wide).
I search the decimation rate of GSM for GNURadio on the Google. I got some
information from
http://www.segfault.net/gsm/The_Beginners_Guide_to_analyzing_GSM_data_in_MatLab.pdf
However, I don't understand why
