Yes! I realised that right after sending the message. I was confused because
the results were not making sense to me (I was computing the bins resolution in
the wrong way, using the reduced sample rate due to FFT overlapping instead of
the original one), and I ended up asking a stupid question..
To whom it may concern:
I don't know osmocom_spectrum_sense well enough to answer this, but I
believe that the purpose of the overlapping is to remove aliasing and the
filter roll-off. If that is the case, you must drop from the both side, not
from one side (assuming symmetrical filter).
Regardin
> Does anyone know why the first and last 25% of FFT bins are discarded? I am
> talking about the following lines of code:
>
> line 267: bin_start = int(tb.fft_size * ((1 - 0.75) / 2))
> line 277: bin_stop = int(tb.fft_size - bin_start)
Read that code again ... it discards the first and last 12.5%
Dear all,
I think that my last question regarding osmocom_spectrum_sense was too general
to be answered, so I will try with something more specific.
Does anyone know why the first and last 25% of FFT bins are discarded? I am
talking about the following lines of code:
line 267: bin_start = int(
