On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:16:15AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 14:45 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> > > The 2.0 port isn't doing as well - a few eyes show up here
> > > and there:
> > >
> > > http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/g2_eq_data-1.jpg
> > >
>
> Yep - looking at the 0
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 14:45 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> > The 2.0 port isn't doing as well - a few eyes show up here
> > and there:
> >
> > http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/g2_eq_data-1.jpg
> >
> > and that's with the NOP equalizer. The LMS eq is all noise
> > all the time.
>
> To me it looks
> The 2.0 port isn't doing as well - a few eyes show up here
> and there:
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/g2_eq_data-1.jpg
>
> and that's with the NOP equalizer. The LMS eq is all noise
> all the time.
To me it looks like the symbol timing tracker is not tracking properly.
As the sample
Here's some pictures for Friday - I though these were interesting,
the output of the 0.9 atsc equalizer showing the 8 levels getting
more distinct with every field:
http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/g09_eq_data-1.jpg
Zooming in:
http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/g09_eq_data-2.jpg
shows the
