I feel wiki markup is the best way to go. Its friendly on the writer and
makes for readable diffs. I dont like the idea of checking in generated
docbook xml.
We could use restructured text
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReStructuredText and docutils to convert it
to xml, html, etc.
-josh
1
Thank you Josh and Eric for the Responses
> From: Josh Blum
>
> I am afraid that the files look hand-written. You can misuse doxygen to make
> manuals by feeding it hand written xml. At least I think thats the case.
Whats I'm looking for is a new approach to generate both html and PDF
docu
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:50:56PM -0700, Firas Abbas wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> What are the tools used to create the following Gnu Radio documents:
>
> a) exploring-gnuradio.xml
> b) usrp_guide.xml
> c) gr-trellis.xml
These are DOCBOOK source files (XML).
http://www.docbook.org/whatis
They where wr
I am afraid that the files look hand-written. You can misuse doxygen to
make manuals by feeding it hand written xml. At least I think thats the
case.
I am interested to have a wiki-based markup, where the wiki code could
be rendered into doxygen xml by a small python script (or just strait to
Hi.
What are the tools used to create the following Gnu Radio documents:
a) exploring-gnuradio.xml
b) usrp_guide.xml
c) gr-trellis.xml
Best Regards,
Firas
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
