set_freq would not be a good measure, since it takes a while to
configure the daughterboard. find() isn't great either, since it
waits 10ms to ensure that it's gathered all responses to it's
broadcast.
set_rx_decim should give a reasonable measurement, as long as you're
not streaming data.
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Mattias Kjellsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouldn't one be able to use for instance "set_freq()" or find() as a
> messure? Although there might be some overhead, you will receive an "ok
> I have set the freq"/"Ok here I am"- packet from the usrp2. Although one
Hi,
Wouldn't one be able to use for instance "set_freq()" or find() as a
messure? Although there might be some overhead, you will receive an "ok
I have set the freq"/"Ok here I am"- packet from the usrp2. Although one
could think of more elaborate schemes involving a special OP_CODE
(usrp2_et
Hi,
If USRP2 can respond to PING and reply back, then one should be able to measure
the delay.
Regards,
Firas
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:01:14PM +0200, Pauli Rikula wrote:
> I foud this wery usefull: http://www.gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/UsrpFAQ/Latency
>
> Is there similar calculations about the latency of the USRP2?
>
> If there is not, could someone please do those calculations?
>
> - Pauli Rikula
I did
I foud this wery usefull: http://www.gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/UsrpFAQ/Latency
Is there similar calculations about the latency of the USRP2?
If there is not, could someone please do those calculations?
--
- Pauli Rikula
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing lis
