Fwd: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair

2009-05-18 Thread Ryan Seal
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:26:58 -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote: Matt Ettus wrote: Paul Mathews wrote: Paul, Thanks for your analysis of the situation. C73 and C74 are not actually capacitors, they are, as you say, electrostatic discharge protectors, part number PESD0402-060. I have not seen any

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair

2009-05-18 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Matt Ettus wrote: > Paul Mathews wrote: > > Paul, > > Thanks for your analysis of the situation. C73 and C74 are not > actually capacitors, they are, as you say, electrostatic discharge > protectors, part number PESD0402-060. I have not seen any fail in the > manor you mention, but I suppose enou

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair

2009-05-18 Thread Paul Mathews
m Cc: 'GNURadio Discussion List' Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair Paul Mathews wrote: > About a month ago, our USRP1 Rev. 4.5 (Ser. #2728) became erratic in > it USB connection and communications. A short while after, USB failed > altogethe

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair

2009-05-18 Thread Matt Ettus
Paul Mathews wrote: About a month ago, our USRP1 Rev. 4.5 (Ser. #2728) became erratic in it USB connection and communications. A short while after, USB failed altogether. I put scope probes on the USB + and - data lines and observed that one of the signals had a much different sort of signal than

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP1 USB I/F failure & repair

2009-05-18 Thread Paul Mathews
About a month ago, our USRP1 Rev. 4.5 (Ser. #2728) became erratic in it USB connection and communications. A short while after, USB failed altogether. I put scope probes on the USB + and - data lines and observed that one of the signals had a much different sort of signal than the other. Following