Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP for Radioastronomy

2005-06-23 Thread Matt Ettus
> What kind of avg_alpha were you using on the FFTs? .001 How does one interpret > your DDC frequency? The signal we wanted was at 1420.4 MHz. The downconverter they had there had a 1320 MHz LO. That put the H line at 100.4 MHz. Since the amplitude out of the test port we were using w

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP for Radioastronomy

2005-06-23 Thread Matt Ettus
Marcus D. Leech wrote: > Lamar Owen wrote: > > >>How did you get the flatter baselines? Was this through the DBS_RX or >>baseband? Did Charles see this? :-) > > > The DDC was set to -5.75Mhz. Doesn't the TVRX produce a 5.75Mhz IF? > > Perhaps (rampant speculation, and apologies to everyone

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP for Radioastronomy

2005-06-23 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Lamar Owen wrote: > > How did you get the flatter baselines? Was this through the DBS_RX or > baseband? Did Charles see this? :-) The DDC was set to -5.75Mhz. Doesn't the TVRX produce a 5.75Mhz IF? Perhaps (rampant speculation, and apologies to everyone, especially Matt, if I'm wrong) the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP for Radioastronomy

2005-06-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 23 June 2005 19:33, Matt Ettus wrote: > I just got back from the SARA conference, and while I was there I was > able to connect a USRP to the 40ft dish. The following link has screen > shots of some quick tests we made. The middle line in each picture > represents the zero doppler hyd

[Discuss-gnuradio] USRP for Radioastronomy

2005-06-23 Thread Matt Ettus
I just got back from the SARA conference, and while I was there I was able to connect a USRP to the 40ft dish. The following link has screen shots of some quick tests we made. The middle line in each picture represents the zero doppler hydrogen line frequency of approx 1420.4 MHz. Anything to t