On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:44:51AM -0400, Don Ward wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Eric Blossom"
> To: "Marcus D. Leech"
> Cc: "GNURadio Discussion List"
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio]
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Blossom"
To: "Marcus D. Leech"
Cc: "GNURadio Discussion List"
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UDP source block in GRC
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:23:43PM -0400, Marcus D. Leech w
On 04/22/2010 06:24 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:23:43PM -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to use a UDP source block from a GRC-produced flowgraph.
>>
>> The only thing it does is this:
>>
>> gr_block_executor: source produced no output.
>> We're marking it
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:23:43PM -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> I'm trying to use a UDP source block from a GRC-produced flowgraph.
>
> The only thing it does is this:
>
> gr_block_executor: source produced no output.
> We're marking it DONE.
The udp source/sink needs an overhaul.
This err
rika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ulrika.uppman=foi...@gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of Mattias Kjellsson
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 6:41 PM
> To: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] UDP source block in GRC
>
> Judging by the
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 19:23, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Any cluage?
Yes. I'll wait to see if Eric responds, as this is his area, but in
short, the error is intentional.
Johnathan
Judging by the code in gr_block_executor.cc lines 291- 321, I think that
the sour
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 19:23, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> Any cluage?
Yes. I'll wait to see if Eric responds, as this is his area, but in
short, the error is intentional.
Johnathan
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://list
I'm trying to use a UDP source block from a GRC-produced flowgraph.
The only thing it does is this:
gr_block_executor: source produced no output.
We're marking it DONE.
Which seems rather useless. How does a block get marked "done" in this
way? That block may not start
producing data for s
