Hi, most magnificient SDR project,
because we're done with the merge of `next` into `master`, I'd like to
delete the former branch from our reference repository.
Unlike the old `maint` branch, no maintainer should have based anything
on the `next` branch, so I don't expect anyone's work flow to b
On 22.02.2011 20:27, Don Ward wrote:
> (2) The Boost 'filesystem' module does not build on MinGW, because wstring
> is not supported in its libstdc++. I will look at the latest MinGW to see
> if this has changed. One possibility is to use an alternate C++ library
> (such as STLPort), but that
On 22.02.2011 04:50, Don Ward wrote:
> Tom Rondeau wrote:
>> I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
>> testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
>> reports.
I installed the Cygwin 1.43 boost libraries, but:
checking for exit in -lboost_unit_t
Tom Rondeau wrote:
I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
reports.
Two more issues with the 'next' branch:
(1) It appears that the Boost 'system' and 'filesystem' modules are now
required. This
On 02/21/2011 07:50 PM, Don Ward wrote:
> Tom Rondeau wrote:
>
>> I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
>> testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
>> reports.
>
> Compilation on Cygwin fails because there is no (#included
> by volk_comp
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Don Ward wrote:
> Tom Rondeau wrote:
>
>> I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
>> testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
>> reports.
>
> Compilation on Cygwin fails because there is no (#included by
> vo
Tom Rondeau wrote:
I would ask all of you who can to start either using or at least
testing out the 'next' branch now and provide us with feedback and bug
reports.
Compilation on Cygwin fails because there is no (#included by
volk_complex.h) in Cygwin. In fact, there appears to be no suppor
Hey group,
As we discussed on our call last week, we are trying to move ahead to
getting GNU Radio 3.4 released. To do this, we have a big shift to
make, which is making our current 'next' branch into the 'master'
branch and cutting a new 'next' from there. But before we do this,
Johnathan and I wo
