On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:45:48PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:23 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> > Looking closer at the De/Interleaver - I see the implementation
> > code (atsci) for that already exists but is convolutional
> > interleaver == data interleaver ?
> >
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:23 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> Looking closer at the De/Interleaver - I see the implementation
> code (atsci) for that already exists but is convolutional
> interleaver == data interleaver ?
>
Ok, I see that atsci_data_interleaver.h includes
convolutional_interleave
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 14:51 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> When you loop the deinterleaver back, you'll need to account for the
> 52 segment delay through it. Using gr.skiphead is probably the
> easiest solution (thanks Martin!).
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Yet to be done:
> > ---
> >
> >
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:27:51PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:16 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> > I moved it all to a new module, gr-atsc in CVS.
> >
> > It's already autoconfiscated and ready to go. There's a file,
> > README.signal_flow in the top level directory t
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:16 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> I moved it all to a new module, gr-atsc in CVS.
>
> It's already autoconfiscated and ready to go. There's a file,
> README.signal_flow in the top level directory that tells how the old
> code was connected together. There are loopback tes
