Thank you all for the precious suggestions.
Antonio
On 04/23/2014 05:45 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:37:44 +0200
Attila Kinali wrote:
For all else. Using a good quartz oscillator is more than good enough
and you dont need to care about anything but having approximately the
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:37:44 +0200
Attila Kinali wrote:
> For all else. Using a good quartz oscillator is more than good enough
> and you dont need to care about anything but having approximately the
> right signal levels.
Let me give you a bit more information here.
According to the N210 schem
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:07:52 +0200
Antonio Petrolino wrote:
> Using an external 10 MHz reference clock, a square wave will offer the
> best phase noise performance, but a sinusoid is acceptable.
The difference between the phase noise of a square wave and a sinus
input is negligible in a radio
On 04/23/2014 09:31 AM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi,
looking at the N200 schematics from files.ettus.com, I'd say:
stick to the 0dBm, your clock signal has to pass a transformer and
some safety/matching circuitry and still ought to be more accurate
than the on-board VCTCXO; the clock multiplexer
(
On 04/23/2014 09:07 AM, Antonio Petrolino wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a USRP N210 and I need a 10 MHz reference clock. From
ettus.com I got:
"
Ref Clock - 10 MHz
Using an external 10 MHz reference clock, a square wave will offer the
best phase noise performance, but a sinusoid is acceptable. The
We posted those numbers because they are the numbers we know will work
reliably. -15dBm is unlikely to work well, but you won't damage anything
by trying.
Matt
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Antonio Petrolino
wrote:
> Thank you Marcus,
> I will wait for some answers from usrp-us...@lists.ett
Thank you Marcus,
I will wait for some answers from usrp-us...@lists.ettus.com before
proceeding.
Best regards,
Antonio
On 04/23/2014 03:31 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi,
looking at the N200 schematics from files.ettus.com, I'd say:
stick to the 0dBm, your clock signal has to pass a transforme
Hi,
looking at the N200 schematics from files.ettus.com, I'd say:
stick to the 0dBm, your clock signal has to pass a transformer and some
safety/matching circuitry and still ought to be more accurate than the on-board
VCTCXO; the clock multiplexer
(http://www.micrel.com/index.php/en/products/cl
Hi,
I'm using a USRP N210 and I need a 10 MHz reference clock. From
ettus.com I got:
"
Ref Clock - 10 MHz
Using an external 10 MHz reference clock, a square wave will offer the
best phase noise performance, but a sinusoid is acceptable. The
reference clock requires the following power level
