Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: double buffering with new thread-per-block scheduler

2008-09-04 Thread Juha Vierinen
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 03:36, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:12:26AM +0300, Juha Vierinen wrote: >> Responding to my own mail. It seems that you cannot have two disjoint >> parts within a graph. > > This is incorrect. Good. > See for example the "single argum

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: double buffering with new thread-per-block scheduler

2008-09-03 Thread Eric Blossom
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 01:12:26AM +0300, Juha Vierinen wrote: > Responding to my own mail. It seems that you cannot have two disjoint > parts within a graph. This is incorrect. See for example the "single argument version of connect" such as used in gnuradio-examples/python/digital/tunnel.py and

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: double buffering with new thread-per-block scheduler

2008-09-03 Thread Juha Vierinen
Responding to my own mail. It seems that you cannot have two disjoint parts within a graph. For now I solved the problem by increasing nblocks to an insanely large number. juha On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 00:04, Juha Vierinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to implement doub