[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2007-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Karrels
I am currently exploring the multiple USRP Tx problem. I came across a thread from 2006 with someone working on similar problems... Has there been any progress on this? I don't want to duplicate any work. Thanks On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: > On 4/15/06 4:32

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2006-04-17 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:09:39PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: > On 4/15/06 4:32 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the time being just never setting the frequency to anything other than 0 > will do so I'm going to do that in order to bypass the DUC in the AD9862. I > just w

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2006-04-16 Thread Elaine Garbarine
On 4/15/06 4:32 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:51:36PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: >> On 4/14/06 6:58 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:18:47PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: >> >>> On problem that will need

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2006-04-15 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:51:36PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: > On 4/14/06 6:58 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:18:47PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: > > > On problem that will need some thinking about is that we're using the > > DUC in the AD9862

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2006-04-14 Thread Elaine Garbarine
On 4/14/06 6:58 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:18:47PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: >> Eric, >> >> I'm not sure how relevant my questions would be so I decided to take this >> off list. > > Very relevant. I've cc'd the list on this reply. > >>

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: USRP Tx Question

2006-04-14 Thread Eric Blossom
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:18:47PM -0400, Elaine Garbarine wrote: > Eric, > > I'm not sure how relevant my questions would be so I decided to take this > off list. Very relevant. I've cc'd the list on this reply. > I have a USRP configuration with one USRP acting as master and the other > act