Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

2015-02-19 Thread Richard Bell
n Hartung, Dr. > Dirk Hoheisel, Christoph Kübel, > Uwe Raschke, Wolf-Henning Scheider, Dr. Werner Struth, Peter Tyroller > > *Von:* discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch@gnu.org > [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch@gnu.org] *Im >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

2015-02-19 Thread Ludwig Stephan (CR/AEH4)
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch@gnu.org] Im Auftrag von Richard Bell Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 00:45 An: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Betreff: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power Hello all, My question is, looking at my receiver flowgraph, woul

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

2015-02-18 Thread Ed Criscuolo
On 2/18/15, 6:45 PM, Richard Bell wrote: Hello all, I am testing a QPSK Tx/Rx I made in grc across two USRP N210's. I can demodulate and decode the data fine at the receiver to produce the bits I transmitted. The problem is, when watching the frequency sink at the output of the USRP source (pict

[Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

2015-02-18 Thread Richard Bell
Hello all, I am testing a QPSK Tx/Rx I made in grc across two USRP N210's. I can demodulate and decode the data fine at the receiver to produce the bits I transmitted. The problem is, when watching the frequency sink at the output of the USRP source (picture attached), there is typically 4 seconds