On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Pol Henarejos wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> Even though the loses are low, I would like to do not lose any sample. I
> implemented a sink/source block using shared memory and I can guarantee
> that there are no loses.
> However I discovered a deeper problem. There is a str
Dear Tom,
Even though the loses are low, I would like to do not lose any sample. I
implemented a sink/source block using shared memory and I can guarantee
that there are no loses.
However I discovered a deeper problem. There is a strange behaviour with
hier_block2. I test the following topoly:
A -
> I also tried to use a tcp stack to obtain a fileno and then use
> file_descriptor_source/sink but in windows is not possible to use
> read/write on a socket descriptor (you can only use recv/send). So I
> need to find another solution but I don't know how to solve it.
>
if it helps, there is a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Pol Henarejos wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I would need to communicate two separated gnuradio programs. I tried to
> use udp_sink / udp_source in the same machine but there are many many
> packets lost. Is there a way to use a kind of sink/source without losses
> to com
Dear list,
I would need to communicate two separated gnuradio programs. I tried to
use udp_sink / udp_source in the same machine but there are many many
packets lost. Is there a way to use a kind of sink/source without losses
to communicate separated programs in Windows?
I also tried to use a tcp
