Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2009-01-12 Thread Robert McGwier
I guess all's well that ends well. I have 64 bit Linux and Windows XP running on it. No hitches. I see what you are talking about. Bob On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Frank Brickle wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Bob McGwier wrote: > >> >> IF ANYONE CAN SHOW ME WHERE IN THE INS

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2009-01-11 Thread Frank Brickle
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Bob McGwier wrote: > IF ANYONE CAN SHOW ME WHERE IN THE INSTRUCTIONS IT SAYS THIS IS A TWO PASS > PROCESS OR WHERE DURING THE COURSE OF DOING THE FLASH IT SAYS THIS IS A TWO > STEP PROCESS, I WOULD BE PLEASED TO BE TOLD I AM BLIND. Well, sort of. I'd posted a n

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2009-01-11 Thread Bob McGwier
2 AM To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Fw: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE. I'd also expect better performance if running a 64 bit OS. When I get chance I'll install Fedora 10 x86_64 on my D945GCLF2. cheers John - Original Message - From: "Eric Cottrell" To: Sent

Fw: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2009-01-11 Thread John Gumb
I'd also expect better performance if running a 64 bit OS. When I get chance I'll install Fedora 10 x86_64 on my D945GCLF2. cheers John - Original Message - From: "Eric Cottrell" To: Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 3:27 AM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2009-01-04 Thread Eric Cottrell
- Start Original Message - Sent: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:53:06 -0500 From: "Eric A. Cottrell" To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE. > Hello, > > I bought the earlier version of the motherboard with just the 10/100 > ethernet.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Eric A. Cottrell
Bob McGwier wrote: And GPU's are going to become commodity priced quickly and possibly even move into the GPP and replace older ways of doing floating point. With Nvidia CUDA, you can write code for your GPP, call GPU with intrinsics to get pretty quick payback while a better longer term stra

Re: [hpsdr] [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Robert McGwier
ehalf Of Bob McGwier >> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 4:40 PM >> To: 'Newman, Timothy'; 'Marcus D. Leech' >> Cc: hp...@lists.hpsdr.org; flexra...@flex-radio.biz; >> q...@yahoogroups.com; tim.newman...@gmail.com; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> Su

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Bob McGwier
new...@vt.edu] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 10:05 AM To: Marcus D. Leech; Bob McGwier Cc: hp...@lists.hpsdr.org; q...@yahoogroups.com; flexra...@flex-radio.biz; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org; tim.newman...@gmail.com Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE. There are many more ways than jus

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Newman, Timothy
ura...@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE. > While I can heartily agree that for the expansion of SDR into the > consumer space, you want it to run on low-power processors, etc, I can't > agree that "for most operations" you don't need a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Bob McGwier wrote: > One does NOT need to spend thousands of dollars on an SDR computer for most > operations. That is a convenient excuse for me to justify my computer > budget for "development" and get high end things to play with (so I can kill > aliens from another galaxy or FSU laboratory

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 29 December 2008 21:41:03 Bob McGwier wrote: > The intel graphics chip set and northbridge are power hungry. I think the > idea is optimize code for the 330 and not the peripherals with this I think that unfortunately the power consumption is high regardless of wether you actually use

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Bob McGwier
quot;, Molly Bloom -Original Message- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:dar...@dons.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 6:12 PM To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Cc: Bob McGwier; hp...@lists.hpsdr.org; q...@yahoogroups.com; flexra...@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-29 Thread Bob McGwier
olly Bloom -Original Message- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:dar...@dons.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 6:12 PM To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Cc: Bob McGwier; hp...@lists.hpsdr.org; q...@yahoogroups.com; flexra...@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is N

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-28 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 29 December 2008 06:53:30 Bob McGwier wrote: > I am running GnuRadio, SDRMAX, and PowerSDR on my new Intel ATOM 330 > MiniITX motherboard. I had to put a firewire card in the single PCI slot. > The integrated intel graphics are nice and spiffy (glxgears is at 800 fps > if you turn off t

[Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom is NICE.

2008-12-28 Thread Bob McGwier
I am running GnuRadio, SDRMAX, and PowerSDR on my new Intel ATOM 330 MiniITX motherboard. I had to put a firewire card in the single PCI slot. The integrated intel graphics are nice and spiffy (glxgears is at 800 fps if you turn off the desktop enhancements, no wiggly windows please). At 960