Hi Ed - Are you asking whether you can reuse the same namespace and block name
with an OOT module? If so, then so long as you don't load the library
containing the GR-provided block(s), you can make it work -- it's a C++ issue
rather than anything else. That said, it would generally be better
With the new use of C++ namespaces in the 3.7 API, is
it possible for an Out-of-tree (OOT) module to create blocks
that are part of an existing GR namespace?
For instance, if I have a new block that processes digital
data streams, can I create an OOT module called "digital"
and add my block to it
