Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-12 Thread Josh Blum
> > However, since I imagine there are plenty of people who don't really > want to go through the additional step of dealing with git (if they're > used to building from tarballs), I believe cmake has the ability to > create them using the make package_source command, but I admit I've > never tr

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-12 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Ed Criscuolo wrote: > On 1/11/12 4:59 PM, Josh Blum wrote: > >> I dont think this is a tarball of the source tree. Rather, its a tarball >> produced by autotools with only files listed by makefile.ams or >> generated in autotools. >> > > But what of the future? If

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-12 Thread Douglas Geiger
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 01/12/2012 10:53 AM, Ed Criscuolo wrote: >> On 1/11/12 4:59 PM, Josh Blum wrote: >>> I dont think this is a tarball of the source tree. Rather, its a tarball >>> produced by autotools with only files listed by makefile.ams or >>> generated

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-12 Thread Josh Blum
On 01/12/2012 10:53 AM, Ed Criscuolo wrote: > On 1/11/12 4:59 PM, Josh Blum wrote: >> I dont think this is a tarball of the source tree. Rather, its a tarball >> produced by autotools with only files listed by makefile.ams or >> generated in autotools. > > But what of the future? If autotools go

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-12 Thread Ed Criscuolo
On 1/11/12 4:59 PM, Josh Blum wrote: I dont think this is a tarball of the source tree. Rather, its a tarball produced by autotools with only files listed by makefile.ams or generated in autotools. But what of the future? If autotools goes away in favor of cmake, does this mean that tarballs wi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-11 Thread Josh Blum
On 01/11/2012 01:39 PM, Ed Criscuolo wrote: > Tom, > > I was just trying to install the GnuRadio 3.5.1 release tarball, and I > found two problems: > > 1. The tarball does not appear to contain the CMakeLists.txt file. >This forces the use of the autotools instead of cmake. > I dont think

[Discuss-gnuradio] GR 3.5.1 release tarball bugs

2012-01-11 Thread Ed Criscuolo
Tom, I was just trying to install the GnuRadio 3.5.1 release tarball, and I found two problems: 1. The tarball does not appear to contain the CMakeLists.txt file. This forces the use of the autotools instead of cmake. 2. After successfully installing UHD release 3.3.2, the GnuRadio confi