Hello all,
I have added some simple build instructions for FreeBSD to the wiki :
http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/FreeBSDInstall
These are off the top of my head as I do not have access right now to a
clean FreeBSD install to test, If someone could walk though them on a clean
sys
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:06:17AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Is the gr-radio-astronomy patch a FreeBSD fix, or generic?
Somehow the original comments that were supposed to be attached
got dropped, they follow here.
Hi,
I have some diffs for gnuradio on FreeBSD. It runs fine.
I also have a
Is the gr-radio-astronomy patch a FreeBSD fix, or generic?
ppdev.c:
I don't see why the include of sstream is conditional on the various pp
methods.
The diff seems to add code for Linux as well, but I wonder if that's an
artifact of how diff chose to deal with before/after.
Other than that ques
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:01:57PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote:
> http://www.db.net/~db/gnuradio-freebsd.tgz
>
> - Diane VA3DB
> --
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.db.net/~db
>
Thanks!
I'll take a look at them later today or tomorrow.
Eric
http://www.db.net/~db/gnuradio-freebsd.tgz
- Diane VA3DB
--
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.db.net/~db
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 06:14, LRK wrote:
> Here run as user gr:
>
> ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 128
> xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 67.3 seconds. 1.996e+06 bytes/sec. cpu time =
> 1.312 noverruns = 16
>
> ./test_usrp_standard_rx -D 64
> xfered 1.34e+08 bytes in 33.6 seconds. 3.994e+06 bytes/sec. cpu tim
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:06:28AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> Don't use the -M option with small values. You won't get a good
> answer unless you let it run for 10 - 20 seconds or so. We want to
> know what it will sustain over an extended period of time. You'll
> probabably want to run eac
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:24:35AM -0500, LRK wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:35:50AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > > triggered the problem here.
> >
> > That should be the right answer, but is not completely re
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:35:50AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > triggered the problem here.
>
> That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
Since I don't have a Tx board, I couldn't run that test
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:05, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> > triggered the problem here.
> >
> > cheerio Berndt
>
> That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
>
> Try running test_usrp_standard_rx with different va
>
> I believe it was gnuradio-examples/python/usrp/benchmark_usb.py that
> triggered the problem here.
>
> cheerio Berndt
That should be the right answer, but is not completely reliable.
Try running test_usrp_standard_rx with different values of the
-D option. Start with -D 128, then try -D
-Original Message-
From: LRK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 3:14 PM
To: Berndt Josef Wulf
Cc: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FreeBSD - more
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:50:46PM +0930, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
>> >> &g
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:50:46PM +0930, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> >> > Progress but as always clues are welcome.
> >>
> >> Do NetBSD and FreeBSD use the same USB implementation?
> >
> > At least very similar. Berndt sent me a patch for the ugen.c code and it
> > looks similar at that point altho
>> > Progress but as always clues are welcome.
>>
>> Do NetBSD and FreeBSD use the same USB implementation?
>
> At least very similar. Berndt sent me a patch for the ugen.c code and it
> looks similar at that point although the line numbers don't match. The
> patch also did not seem to affect my pr
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:26:56PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > Disabling the ethernet interface seems to have some small effect on the
> > overruns while running the wfm code and listening to FM but they still do
> > hit occasionally and can be heard in the audio.
>
> You might try telling
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:55:41AM -0500, LRK wrote:
>
> I'm still in way over my head here but some progress:
>
>
> usrp_wfm_rcv(_nogui).py runs with either the Basic Rx or TV Rx board.
>
> Since most of the FM stations are 4 to 6 miles away, it is easy to get
> strong signals.
>
> I get uO
I'm still in way over my head here but some progress:
usrp_wfm_rcv(_nogui).py runs with either the Basic Rx or TV Rx board.
Since most of the FM stations are 4 to 6 miles away, it is easy to get
strong signals.
I get uO errors which I think means the USRP is reporting errors sending
bytes in
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:38:39PM -0500, LRK wrote:
>
> My test machine has an Intel 82801DB chip which claims to provide USB 2.0
> support for all six USB ports. FreeBSD, however, installs the uhci driver
> rather than ehci. The ehci/usb module shows to be loaded and the Intel
> chip found but a
This is not encouraging:
EHCI(4)FreeBSD Kernel Interfaces ManualEHCI(4)
NAME
ehci -- USB Enhanced Host Controller driver
SYNOPSIS
device ehci
DESCRIPTION
The ehci driver provides support for the USB Enhanced Host Controller
Interface, which
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LRK writes:
>> Here is what I have put in my /etc/rc.local to fix my scanner:
>>
>> devfs ruleset 10
>> devfs rule add path uscanner0 mode 666
>
>That does indeed work but with one little strangie:
>
>If the USRP is connected and powered up when the boot
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LRK writes:
> >On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>
> >> To get the desired ownership of particular devices on modern FreeBSD
> >> systems, you need to use the de
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Blossom writes:
>On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> To get the desired ownership of particular devices on modern FreeBSD
>> systems, you need to use the devfs(8) to define rules for non-standard
>> ownership/modes/permissio
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> To get the desired ownership of particular devices on modern FreeBSD
> systems, you need to use the devfs(8) to define rules for non-standard
> ownership/modes/permissions etc.
>
> Poul-Henning
>
> PS: No, I don't have an USR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LRK writes:
>On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> To get the desired ownership of particular devices on modern FreeBSD
>> systems, you need to use the devfs(8) to define rules for non-standard
>> ownership/modes/permissions etc.
>
On Friday 30 September 2005 20:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> PS: No, I don't have an USRP myself, I keep putting off buying one
> until I have time to play with it.
Join the club :)
I keep trying to get work interested.. Hopefully soon!
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Gene
To get the desired ownership of particular devices on modern FreeBSD
systems, you need to use the devfs(8) to define rules for non-standard
ownership/modes/permissions etc.
Poul-Henning
PS: No, I don't have an USRP myself, I keep putting off buying one
until I have time to play with it.
--
Pou
26 matches
Mail list logo
