Dear Tom,
I will give it a try. I will keep you in touch.
Thanks for your answer.
Pol Henarejos
Research Engineer, MSc
pol.henare...@cttc.es
Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC)
Engineering Unit
Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 7
08860 Castellde
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Pol Henarejos wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> All blocks are written by me. B and C produce 40 and 80 samples,
> respectively. They have set_output_multiple to 40 and 80. Both forecast
> have in0=noutput/40 and in0=noutput/80. A block does not have nor
> set_output_multiple
Dear Tom,
All blocks are written by me. B and C produce 40 and 80 samples,
respectively. They have set_output_multiple to 40 and 80. Both forecast
have in0=noutput/40 and in0=noutput/80. A block does not have nor
set_output_multiple nor forecast. D block (2 inputs 1 output) has
set_output_multiple
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Pol Henarejos wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have a simple flowgraph with two branches, with different delays that
> are joined at the end. Imagine a topblock with A,B,C,D blocks. A is
> connected to B and C. B and C are connected to D. A and D are sink and
> source res
Dear list,
I have a simple flowgraph with two branches, with different delays that
are joined at the end. Imagine a topblock with A,B,C,D blocks. A is
connected to B and C. B and C are connected to D. A and D are sink and
source respectively. B and C produce packets (header and payload) from
the i
