On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 23:30 -0700, Richard Bell wrote:
> This topic of hardware efficient designs vs general purpose processor
> (GPP) efficient is very interesting. I assumed the most efficient
> hardware designs would tend to translate well into a GPP, because most
> good hardware designs are goo
This topic of hardware efficient designs vs general purpose processor (GPP)
efficient is very interesting. I assumed the most efficient hardware designs
would tend to translate well into a GPP, because most good hardware designs are
good because they parallelize things like crazy. You would thin
> If you can put together a patch that gives us a bit of a boost here,
> that'd be great. But as you say, it doesn't look like this algorithm
> as it is will ever be fantastically fast. It was definitely meant more
> for hardware than this case.
>
My first attempt at integration sees a performa
