Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FLEX900 RX2 Port

2010-02-22 Thread Matt Ettus
On 02/19/2010 11:21 PM, Firas Abbas wrote: Hi, From: Matt Ettus Yes, you can do full duplex, but you should not connect the ports directly or you will blow out the receiver. There will be enough leakage that you can just put attenuators. Matt Is USRP2 Antenna selection (TX/RX , RX2) wor

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FLEX900 RX2 Port

2010-02-19 Thread Firas Abbas
Hi, > From: Matt Ettus > > > Yes, you can do full duplex, but you should not connect the ports > directly or you will blow out the receiver. There will be enough > leakage that you can just put attenuators. > > Matt Is USRP2 Antenna selection (TX/RX , RX2) works for the current firmware

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FLEX900 RX2 Port

2010-02-18 Thread Sharif Shaher
Hi Matt, Thanks for the advice, but might you know how I can configure usrp2_fft.py to use port RX2, as i had mentioned, augmenting usrp2_fft.py in the fashion I described does not work. For that matter, might you know in general how to direct reception to RX2 instead of TX/RX which I believe

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FLEX900 RX2 Port

2010-02-18 Thread Matt Ettus
On 02/18/2010 11:38 AM, Sharif Shaher wrote: Hello, I am trying to run a loopback test where I am using the USRP2 and the FLEX900 daughter board. I have connected the TX/RX port directly to the RX2 port. I am running usrp2_siggen.py as is (presumably transmitting out the TX/RX port) and then als

[Discuss-gnuradio] FLEX900 RX2 Port

2010-02-18 Thread Sharif Shaher
Hello, I am trying to run a loopback test where I am using the USRP2 and the FLEX900 daughter board. I have connected the TX/RX port directly to the RX2 port. I am running usrp2_siggen.py as is (presumably transmitting out the TX/RX port) and then also running usrp2_fft.py. I tried to modif