[Discuss-gnuradio] Docker install recommendation

2018-09-03 Thread U L
I'm planning on installing the next branch (py3) for testing and potential development. I'd like to do so in a docker container to isolate dependencies. There seems to be a number of starting points including gnuradio-docker and pybombs-docker in the gnuradio repo. There's also a bunch of recipes

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nick Foster
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:40 PM Nicholas McCarthy wrote: > Yeah, this is one of the things I like most about Dockerfiles... the self > documenting aspect. However... have you noticed how many times you end up > dealing with Docker images apart from their Dockerfiles? For a lot of > useful image

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nicholas McCarthy
and then there's this https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/12053 I'm not even sure what version of Docker I used when I did the compression thing... it wasn't 1.10. Cheers, Nick M. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:40 PM Nicholas McCarthy wrote: > Yeah, this is one of the things I like most abo

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nicholas McCarthy
Yeah, this is one of the things I like most about Dockerfiles... the self documenting aspect. However... have you noticed how many times you end up dealing with Docker images apart from their Dockerfiles? For a lot of useful images, it's difficult (maybe impossible?) to track the Dockerfile down.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nick Foster
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:54 PM Nicholas McCarthy wrote: > Three points to make about this OOT Docker example. > 1) Everything you're doing manually here can be accomplished using > pybombs2... and pybombs2 makes itself quite amenable to existing within the > Docker image both as an interface to

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nicholas McCarthy
Three points to make about this OOT Docker example. 1) Everything you're doing manually here can be accomplished using pybombs2... and pybombs2 makes itself quite amenable to existing within the Docker image both as an interface to what's already installed on the image and a handy way to install ne

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Nick Foster
> > I think it would be really helpful for the GNU Radio project to support a >> standard, basic gnuradio docker install with uhd and grc enabled as well as >> an example or two to demonstrate sane ways to run OOT modules on top of >> that image. As Ben mentioned, Docker seems like a pretty energy

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-14 Thread Ben Hilburn
Having almost no experience with Docker myself, I unfortunately don't have much in the way of worthwhile technical input on this. That said, I really do want to encourage this conversation. Installation of GNU Radio on one machine can be a pain for many people, and doing it on many machines over a

[Discuss-gnuradio] Docker

2016-04-13 Thread Nicholas McCarthy
Sorry I'm a few days late to the Docker party (and I don't have the original thread at hand). Thanks, Stefan, for sharing your work. I want to share something similar I worked up for my stack when Martin released pybombs2 and exposed me to the "deploy" function. https://hub.docker.com/r/namccart

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Stefan Wunsch
Keep in mind the automated build service of hub.docker.com! For those who don't know how it works: It is connected to the github repo and rebuilds after each new commit the needed images (or layers) automatically. As well, it would be possible to build automatically images for each release of gnura

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Stefan Wunsch wrote: > Regarding running the GUI: In the readme I've included the commands for > X forwarding (that's your approach). Works fine on my machine! The VNC > approach targets especially windows users. > I've had success running GRC and QT-based GNU Ra

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hilburn wrote: > It seems like Docker could make it much easier for us to support a variety > of operating systems - although the user would still need to install > Docker, itself. Presumably that's easier than earlier containerized models, > though (e.g., VMs

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Stefan Wunsch
I think (but I am not totally sure) that you can target multiple cores from a single container. So the -j option should work on your local machine. But not on hub.docker.com, because you have only one core on the server machine. Greetings On 04/08/2016 05:08 PM, Kevin Hofschröer wrote: > Also, is

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Stefan Wunsch
Hi, That's true for now, but ubuntu's repos aren't made for developing. The repos are just too old within a few month. And then recent (or self developed) OOTs won't work. Regarding running the GUI: In the readme I've included the commands for X forwarding (that's your approach). Works fine on my

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Kevin Hofschröer
Also, is there a reason not to use the "-j" option in a Dockerfile? Kevin ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Kevin Hofschröer
Hello Stefan and all, I also recently experimented with GR and Docker and at least got it working so far. My approach was different in that I used the ubuntu:16.04 base image where gnuradio v3.7.9.1 (so pretty new) is available pre-compiled in the official ubuntu repositories. Of course that ap

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Ben Hilburn
Thanks for the responses, Stefan and Nick. It seems like Docker could make it much easier for us to support a variety of operating systems - although the user would still need to install Docker, itself. Presumably that's easier than earlier containerized models, though (e.g., VMs). Cheers, Ben __

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-08 Thread Stefan Wunsch
Hey, Using hardware with docker containers is pretty easy. Just use the --device flag and (effectively) share a folder/file of your host with the container or use the --net=host flag to share the network connection. Basically, that's all! And Nick Foster is right, there should be almost no overhe

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-07 Thread Ben Hilburn
Hi Stefan - This is really cool! Thanks so much for sharing your images and for posting instructions. It looks like a number of people have started playing with GNU Radio containers - I recognize some of the other names that have publicly shared images (e.g., Nick Foster aka 'bistromath'). We chat

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-07 Thread Nick Foster
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016, 3:48 PM Ben Hilburn wrote: > > What was your experience like when it came to using the RTL dongle? Was > there any complexity there? If you have hardware that can stream at higher > rates, I'd be interested in how those perform in the container, as well. > Performance is, fo

[Discuss-gnuradio] [Docker] New GNU Radio images with GUI support

2016-04-06 Thread Stefan Wunsch
Hi all! I have build a docker tool-chain for an image with GNU Radio and UHD installed via PyBOMBS on top of Ubuntu. It's even possible to run it dockerized with a GUI using VNC and it should work as well on windows and mac (so far, not tested). The build files are available on github and the prec