On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 09:09 -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Richard Bell
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for replying. The question is, how do I do this? We
> both agree the zeros need to go. What I'm not sure on is how
> to do that. I'd rather keep
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> Thanks for replying. The question is, how do I do this? We both agree the
> zeros need to go. What I'm not sure on is how to do that. I'd rather keep
> this contained to GRC, because I don't like maintaining python files not
> connected to g
John,
Thanks for replying. The question is, how do I do this? We both agree the
zeros need to go. What I'm not sure on is how to do that. I'd rather keep
this contained to GRC, because I don't like maintaining python files not
connected to grc. Can you explain how you do this or provide an example
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> When you mentioned I should remove leading or trailing zeros from the
> Correlation Estimator symbols field, how would you go about doing this if
> you used the modulate vector block as done in the example? I'm stuck on
> this.
>
The group
t;>
>> This is difficult to discuss because things get wordy very quickly. Let
>> me know if I can make anything more clear.
>>
>> v/r,
>> Rich
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Andy Walls
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rich
r.
>
> v/r,
> Rich
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Andy Walls
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> > From:
>> > Richard Bell
>> > Su
pr 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Andy Walls
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > From:
> > Richard Bell
> > Subject:
> > Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correlation
> > Estimation Block Oddity
> >
Hi Richard,
> From:
> Richard Bell
> Subject:
> Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correlation
> Estimation Block Oddity
> Date:
> Thu, 23 Ap
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:01 -0400, discuss-gnuradio-requ...@gnu.org
wrote:
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:23:31 -0400
> From: Tom Rondeau
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Nick Foster wrote:
>
> > Short answer: use corr_est as your tag. The corr_start tag is undelayed by
> > the m
I have another question on tag placement for the correlation estimation
block. In the screenshot I've attached, you'll see that the corr_start tag
is placed well before the preamble actually starts. If I use the 'delay
tag' field to move it to the end of the preamble where I need it, it stops
delay
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Nick Foster wrote:
> Short answer: use corr_est as your tag. The corr_start tag is undelayed by
> the matched filter length, and intended for other purposes (data-aided
> equalizers, etc.). Andy Walls can say more, but it's enough to say the
> later three tags ar
Short answer: use corr_est as your tag. The corr_start tag is undelayed by
the matched filter length, and intended for other purposes (data-aided
equalizers, etc.). Andy Walls can say more, but it's enough to say the
later three tags are the ones that match the peak of the correlation in the
output
Hello all,
I'm using GR 3.7.8. I'm trying to work the new Correlation Estimation block
into my design. I'm seeing what looks like unintended behavior for the tag
placements. Sometimes the corr_start tag is placed on the same sample as
the corr_est, time_est and phase_est tags, but sometimes the co
13 matches
Mail list logo
