Il giorno mer 27 mag 2015 alle ore 16:29 Marcus Müller <
marcus.muel...@ettus.com> ha scritto:
> Yes. The Thread-per-Block-scheduler gets its name from the fact that
> every block gets its own thread.
> You should really use it -- using STS will probably kill the performance
> you can gain by acce
Dear Marco,
> I need that different blocks run under the same thread(because CUDA
> require to make everything inside a single thread..each thread is
> associated to a different GPGPU)..so,without the usage of STS
> scheduler,is not possible to run different blocks with same thread?
Yes. The Thread
Il giorno dom 24 mag 2015 alle ore 19:52 Tom Rondeau ha
scritto:
> Don't use the STS scheduler. It is, after all, the Single-Threaded
> Scheduler. And setting the thread affinity under that condition is a nop.
> That will only work with the default TPB scheduler.
>
> Tom
>
> I need that different
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:22 PM, marco Ribero
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've a question about thread management..I like the fact that scheduler
> can launch blocks in different threads, but I'd like to execute some blocks
> inside the same thread(CUDA require to perform all operations from a single
> thread
Hi,
I've a question about thread management..I like the fact that scheduler can
launch blocks in different threads, but I'd like to execute some blocks
inside the same thread(CUDA require to perform all operations from a single
thread)..for the moment I'm using GR_SCHEDULED=STS,but it blocks at all