Will we see a release candidate tarball before the final release? It was the
tarballed version that caused me grieve last time.
Jonathan already said yes and posted it, but you can make your own
tarball with 'make dist' or even better make and test it with 'make
distcheck'. I've made this wo
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 16:06 -0500, Don Ward wrote:
> I have checked out and built this revision on Windows using both Cygwin and
> MinGW. The Cygwin version had no problems, and the MinGW version had only a
> few minor, easily fixed problems (see trac tickets).
Thanks!
Those minor issues have
What we'd like is for people to test this in all the usual ways before
we cut tarballs. You can point your svn client at:
http://gnuradio.org/svn/gnuradio/branches/releases/3.0
I have checked out and built this revision on Windows using both Cygwin and
MinGW. The Cygwin version had no proble
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 14:34 +1030, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote:
> Will we see a release candidate tarball before the final release? It was the
> tarballed version that caused me grieve last time.
Yes. I'm hoping to get as much fixed first before cutting one, though.
> BTW: Is it now save to use "m
G'day,
Will we see a release candidate tarball before the final release? It was the
tarballed version that caused me grieve last time.
SVN based source built, checked, installed and runs fine on
NetBSD-4.99.3-i386. I couldn't test usrp code since I'm away from home in
Beijing at the moment.
N
All,
The GNU Radio release 3.0 branch has accumulated a few bug fixes and
updates over the last several weeks since the 3.0 tarballs went out.
None of these have been serious, and the rate of new bugs has dropped to
nearly zero.
The latest of these updates has been to fix the build issue with
a
