Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-21 Thread Philip Balister
On 04/21/2015 09:43 AM, Murray Thomson wrote: > On 20 April 2015 at 15:13, Philip Balister wrote: > >> >> >> On 04/19/2015 11:07 AM, Murray Thomson wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have built the gnuradio-dev-image for an arm machine and I wanted to >>> share a couple of small issues that I found in t

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-21 Thread Murray Thomson
On 20 April 2015 at 15:13, Philip Balister wrote: > > > On 04/19/2015 11:07 AM, Murray Thomson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have built the gnuradio-dev-image for an arm machine and I wanted to > > share a couple of small issues that I found in the process. > > > > - The meta-sdr/conf/bblayers.conf

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-20 Thread Philip Balister
On 04/19/2015 11:07 AM, Murray Thomson wrote: > Hello, > > I have built the gnuradio-dev-image for an arm machine and I wanted to > share a couple of small issues that I found in the process. > > - The meta-sdr/conf/bblayers.conf.sample doesn't include all the layers > needed. This is correctly

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-20 Thread Murray Thomson
That's very helpful Nathan, thank you. I will have a look when I find some time and I'll report any findings. Cheers, Murray On 20 April 2015 at 01:37, West, Nathan wrote: > It definitely can compile on machines with no neon support, but this > problem is more subtle than that. qemuarm is proba

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-19 Thread West, Nathan
It definitely can compile on machines with no neon support, but this problem is more subtle than that. qemuarm is probably one of the few targets that claims to be a cortex-a9 and not have NEON. As Phil said, we need to improve NEON detection when adding asm kernels to support this case. If you'd l

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-19 Thread Murray Thomson
Thanks for your answer Philip. I think you are right, qemuarm doesn't seem to have neon support yet. It would be great if someone that knows Volk could confirm if it's meant to be able to compile in machines with no neon support. Regards, Murray On 19 April 2015 at 18:51, Philip Balister wrote:

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-19 Thread Philip Balister
On 04/19/2015 11:07 AM, Murray Thomson wrote: > Hello, > > I have built the gnuradio-dev-image for an arm machine and I wanted to > share a couple of small issues that I found in the process. > > - The meta-sdr/conf/bblayers.conf.sample doesn't include all the layers > needed. This is correctly

[Discuss-gnuradio] Bitbaking GnuRadio with meta-sdr master issues

2015-04-19 Thread Murray Thomson
Hello, I have built the gnuradio-dev-image for an arm machine and I wanted to share a couple of small issues that I found in the process. - The meta-sdr/conf/bblayers.conf.sample doesn't include all the layers needed. This is correctly warned in the README file of the layer. I've attached the fil