On 05/28/2013 01:54 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
I think the best approach is just to include every possible method in
GNURadio. This can only make the platform more versatile. I make use
of overlapping a lot because computation times are a pain. The
trade-off in resolution is acceptable to me b
to do the FFT at different resolutions. SETI do
the same thing with the BOINC platform, only on a far greater scale.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:36:19 -0400
> From: j...@febo.com
> To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bins smaller
On 5/28/2013 1:28 PM, Simon IJskes wrote:
On 17-05-13 02:22, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Again, given the fact that your display geometry is likely less than
1280 wide, you'll simply lose information for FFTs larger than that.
I one is looking for weak CW signals, in a waterfall, wouldn't a wide
b
On 05/28/2013 01:28 PM, Simon IJskes wrote:
On 17-05-13 02:22, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Again, given the fact that your display geometry is likely less than
1280 wide, you'll simply lose information for FFTs larger than that.
I one is looking for weak CW signals, in a waterfall, wouldn't a wide
On 17-05-13 02:22, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Again, given the fact that your display geometry is likely less than
1280 wide, you'll simply lose information for FFTs larger than that.
I one is looking for weak CW signals, in a waterfall, wouldn't a wide
bin, make this signal invisible in among th