Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Dave Dodge
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:29:13AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > Does anyone have any other data points? Fedora Core, RedHat? > X86_64 64-bit 32-bit > Red hat EL 4 ${prefix}/lib64${prefix}/lib

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Larry Doolittle
Eric - On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:29:13AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > > Seems like putting the native stuff where it's always been > (${libdir}) would have been an obvious win. For suitable definition of "native", yes. I guess the "problem" that SuSE et al. address with their corruption of thi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:05:07AM -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:16:10AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > > On NetBSD, ${libdir} always has native libraries, where native means > > the instruction set and word size defined by the combination of > > hardware and which ke

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Greg Troxel
Larry Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:16:10AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > - if test "$host_cpu" = "x86_64"; then > > + if test "$host_os" = "Linux" -a "$host_cpu" = "x86_64"; then > > +# XXX Debian may not use this convention. > > In the spirit of auto

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Larry Doolittle
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:16:10AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > On NetBSD, ${libdir} always has native libraries, where native means > the instruction set and word size defined by the combination of > hardware and which kernel is being run. Then, other libraries go in > /emul/foo, where foo can

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-19 Thread Greg Troxel
Berndt Josef Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed a problem when building GNU Radio on x86_64 platforms. GNU > Radio for some reasons insists to install them into ${prefix}/lib64 > where as pkgsrc expects them in ${prefix}/lib. > > > # GR_X86_64() > # > # Checks to see if we're on a x86_

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-18 Thread Larry Doolittle
Guys - On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:14:56PM -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote: > I think Debian went this way for a while, but for the moment > the 32-bit mode is relegated to "emulation" status: 64-bit > libraries go in $prefix/lib, and 32-bit libraries go in > $prefix/emu/ia32-linux/usr/lib. [chop]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-18 Thread Larry Doolittle
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:59:55PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote: > On x86_64 machines, GNU/Linux supports building and running both > 32-bit and 64-bit applications concurrently. The executables are put > in $prefix/bin as normal, and the header on the executable tells the > kernel whether to set it

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-18 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:09:56AM +1030, Berndt Josef Wulf wrote: > G'day, > > I noticed a problem when building GNU Radio on x86_64 platforms. GNU Radio > for > some reasons insists to install them into ${prefix}/lib64 where as pkgsrc > expects them in ${prefix}/lib. > > > # GR_X86_64() > #

[Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64

2005-12-18 Thread Berndt Josef Wulf
G'day, I noticed a problem when building GNU Radio on x86_64 platforms. GNU Radio for some reasons insists to install them into ${prefix}/lib64 where as pkgsrc expects them in ${prefix}/lib. # GR_X86_64() # # Checks to see if we're on a x86_64 machine, and if so, ensure # that libdir ends in "