> Bastian Bloessl-2 wrote
>> The wideband signal is the packet. Actually, it should be terminated with
>> a tx_eob tag. Do you see any ‘U’s on you console? AFAIK, if the packet
>> does not end with an tx_eob tag you might see the oscillator as narrow
>> band signal.
>
> Yes I see 'U's on the cons
Hi Bastian,
Bastian Bloessl-2 wrote
> The wideband signal is the packet. Actually, it should be terminated with
> a tx_eob tag. Do you see any ‘U’s on you console? AFAIK, if the packet
> does not end with an tx_eob tag you might see the oscillator as narrow
> band signal.
Yes I see 'U's on the c
> I find out that it consist of a bursty transmission of a signal compound of
> 11 to 12 msec of wide-band signal followed by a narrower 400 Khz signal that
> lasts around 10 msec and is 20 db stronger then the wide-band signal.
The wideband signal is the packet. Actually, it should be terminated
Hello GR,
Is there any one who has monitored the signal generated by transceiver.py
related to the 802.15.4 implementation. I want to understand the meaning its
structure.
I find out that it consist of a bursty transmission of a signal compound of
11 to 12 msec of wide-band signal followed by a n
