Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 3rd party software (was comedilib question)

2008-09-09 Thread Dimitris Symeonidis
Just putting my 2c in: I also think it's a great idea to have a 3rd party repository, independently of license, the existence of a maintainer etc The main gain of this would be a demonstration of the strength of GnuRadio. Here's what I mean: Today, if someone who has no clue about what GnuRadio ca

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 3rd party software (was comedilib question)

2008-09-09 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM, George Nychis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe an additional SVN is what we need. Maybe a GIT repo. A wiki so that > people can provide some information about their code. We need something. I > don't care of its officially supported by GNU Radio or not, but I

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 3rd party software (was comedilib question)

2008-09-09 Thread George Nychis
Johnathan Corgan wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Dan Halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On this note, but slightly tangential, there are a bunch of third party gnuradio plugins that are not being kept up to date and even no longer work with gnuradio without significant changes. (E.g

[Discuss-gnuradio] 3rd party software (was comedilib question)

2008-08-25 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Dan Halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On this note, but slightly tangential, there are a bunch of third party > gnuradio plugins that are not being kept up to date and even no longer work > with gnuradio without significant changes. (E.g., top block vs flow gr