Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py

2012-07-13 Thread Weixian Zhou
Check https://www.ettus.com/product/category/Daughterboards. On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:04 AM, CHAO DONG wrote: > Thanks very much. > I use rfx400 and rfx2400 now, they're half duplex? > > Regards, > Chao > 在 2012-7-13 下午2:51,"Alex Zhang" 写道: > > The tunnel.py problem seems being complained for

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py

2012-07-13 Thread CHAO DONG
Thanks very much. I use rfx400 and rfx2400 now, they're half duplex? Regards, Chao 在 2012-7-13 下午2:51,"Alex Zhang" 写道: > The tunnel.py problem seems being complained for thousand times :) No > one has final solution now, at least in the archive. > > In my experience, actually, this is a full

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py

2012-07-12 Thread Alex Zhang
The tunnel.py problem seems being complained for thousand times :) No one has final solution now, at least in the archive. In my experience, actually, this is a full-duplex problem. If your daughter board can only support half-duplex, you need additional time to switch to RX right after your

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py

2012-07-12 Thread CHAO DONG
Josh, thanks. Now, when i ping B from A, A can receive some ARP requests but ok=false, so A Will not send ARP reply. With the same setting, i use the benchmark, A can receive almost all the packets from B and ok=true. I think there must be some difference between benchmark and tunnel. Who can expla

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] about the tunnel.py

2012-07-12 Thread Josh Blum
On 07/11/2012 08:57 PM, CHAO DONG wrote: > Dear all, > >I am testing tunnel.py in the narrowband folder, the > configuration is as follows: > OS: ubuntu 11.10 > Gnuradio: latest > UHD:latest > USRP 1 > RFX400 > > I set up two machines and do following the readme step by step. > When