> "The SDR Forum intends to seek permission to publish
> proposals, design documents, engineering drawings, source
> code, analyses, and supporting material developed under the
> challenge entires. No materials shall be marked
> `proprietary'."
>
> IMHO tt would be even better if the implied "owne
On Sunday 28 May 2006 21:15, Robert Roberts wrote:
> I'm currently writing a set of laboratory exercises utilizing
> MATLAB/Simulink and GNURadio/USRP that will introduce various
> communications and digital signal processing concepts. I hope
> to release them once I am finished so they should prov
On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:52, John Gilmore wrote:
> (They won't accept work that has been released under a public
> license, such as the GPL or even the BSD license. If you
> spend two years writing this stuff, they will *own* it at the
> end, and you won't even be able to keep working with or
>
Responding to my own post ...
Here's why the difference is so important:
On Friday 12 May 2006 18:34, al davis wrote:
> You are returning a vector by value:
> from fsm.h:
> //
> std::vector NS () const { return d_NS; }
> std::vector OS () const { return d_OS;
On Friday 12 May 2006 18:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Also, when you do
>
> vector x;
> x[0] = 5;
>
> keep in mind that internally it instantiates a new int
> object, and then calls operator= on it. The compiler might
> optimize this to a certain extent, but certainly not to the
> level of simplicity o
On Friday 12 May 2006 17:56, Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote:
> you can find the relevant code here:
>
> http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~anastas/gnuradio/
>
> looking forward to your comments.
You are returning a vector by value:
from fsm.h:
//
std::vector NS () const { return d_NS; }
std::v
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 00:13, Robert McGwier wrote:
> But the COMPOSITE signal is what is
> FM modulated but I bet they do not preemphasize the composite
> signal. They might do preemphasis on the L+R baseband signal
> as Matt suggests but I just don't know about the others. I
> am trying to
On Monday 13 February 2006 20:06, Matt Ettus wrote:
> I seem to remember that the preemphasis on stereo signals is
> not performed on the multiplexed signal. It is actually
> performed on the audio components separately, before mixing
> with the stereo subcarrier. Therefore deemphasis needs to be
On Thursday 17 February 2005 07:32 pm, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> In the analog world, do they implement squelch using
> detected RF power levels (i.e. prior to FM demod), or
> something else?
It is usually done by measuring detected noise. Recall, in FM,
audio output level is independent of t
