in levels more accurately. The upside is that I know a lot
more about the code now than when I started.
Best regards,
Mark SullivanOn 9/24/06, Matt Ettus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Sullivan wrote:> When I inject a signal at a -45 dBm level on the "RX-B" sma connector> on
Pascal,
Thanks for the tip, I'll add that to version 0.2. I can tell that you are much less "linux impaired" than I!
Best regards,
Mark SullivanOn 9/26/06, Pascal Charest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/22/06, Mark Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
(...)
INST
and
saw the injected carrier. This isn't sounding like software.
Best regards,
Mark SullivanOn 9/22/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:38:54PM -0400, Mark Sullivan wrote:> When I inject a signal at a -45 dBm level on the "RX-B" sma connect
t; but this seems like too
much coupling. Using a 50 ohm termination on the unconnected sma
connector helps a little bit. I see no copy of the signal from either
input of the other Basic RX daughtercard. Any thoghts, anyone?
Best regards,
Mark Sullivan
Here is a walkthough I put together f
the
data to memory before writing out to disk next. Any thoughts?
Best regards,
Mark Sullivan
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
