e
generally found it quicker to write my own block than try to understand
what the built-in blocks actually do!!
Joe
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:44 AM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 12/20/2019 11:33 AM, Joe K wrote:
>
> Yeah, I understand it's not a practical thing in reality, this is mostl
Yeah, I understand it's not a practical thing in reality, this is mostly
for a short-duration simulation which runs for a few K samples then stops.
Obviously any real-world signal with any DC bias would rail this out.
I'm still surprised the integrate_x blocks allow a decimation = 1 since
that eff
Hi all,
Maybe this is a dumb question, but I didn't find any discussion on the web
or in the mailing list archives. The integrate block (e.g.,
blocks.integrate_ff) doesn't seem to operate as I'd expect.
What I'm looking for is a block that integrates from time 0 with no
decimation. So, an input
Hi,
Hopefully I'm not hijacking Mehtap's thread too badly but it seems that the
website with gr-eventstream documentation is no longer available. It
doesn't seem that there's much inline documentation or anything else in the
git repo. Am I missing something? Does anybody have cached copies of t
Hi everybody,
I have a very complex flowgraph that sometimes simply stops processing
receive samples. It doesn't crash, the transmit side of the flowgraph is
still fully operational. There are no exceptions being thrown and nothing
indicating that any threads are dying.
This makes use of a lot
Hi all,
How can I adjust the interpolation of an interpolating FIR filter in real
time (e.g., interp_fir_filter_fff)? I'm not a C++ guru but it appears to
me that the base class, sync_interpolator, does define a function
set_interpolation(). It seems that I should be able to call that, then
call
Yes, N210, specifically.
On Jan 10, 2017 12:44 PM, "Marcus Müller" wrote:
Dear Joe,
this is with a USRP2 or N2x0, right? We (Ettus) are investigating that.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 01/10/2017 05:30 PM, Joe K wrote:
Did you get a resolution on this issue? We had an old app using
Did you get a resolution on this issue? We had an old app using UHD 3.5.4
that, once upgrade to 3.9.x or newer, drastically lowers the transmit
power. In our case we're using subsampling, transmitting at 130 MHz. I
don't know if that's related or not. A while back I built a simple
flowgraph wit
ing approach to dealing with
> the ABI transition in libc.
> http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora/
>
> Try running cmake for volk with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0
>
> Regards,
> Derek
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Joe K wrote:
>
>&
Hi,
I'm having a problem building Volk 1.3 or GNU Radio version than 3.7.10
(any) or 3.7.9.3. Versions 3.7.9.2 and older seem to work fine. This is
on a Fedora 22 system.
I'm getting a ton of undefined reference errors to various Boost
functions. I originally thought maybe the installed versio
Kartik,
As far as I am aware, hierarchical blocks cannot process messages. I ran
into the same issue, because I had a hierarchical block with several child
blocks, and it needed to do some control operations to the child blocks
dependent on a received message, without those blocks "understanding"
11 matches
Mail list logo
