Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Tunnel.py hanging after some time

2010-08-13 Thread An He
Hi Dave, Not sure whether we had the same issue. We modified the original tunnel.py to a multichannel based tunnel. We were able to connect multiple nodes (USRP2+WBX) initially after running tunnel.py. We could ping every nodes. After a while, some nodes started to fail. If we restarted the failin

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Power,Bandwidth and spectru m switch problems

2010-06-30 Thread An He
1. Change tx-gain if you are using tunnel.py. The default value is set to the mid value. Use -h to find out more. 2. Spectrum analyzer would help you to observe. I believe you can also "calculate" based on your settings. Maybe someone can point out where in the code the bandwidth relationship is de

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: On the maximum transmission distance

2010-06-29 Thread An He
By the way the VERT400 144MHz, 400 MHz, and 1200 MHz Tri-band 7-inch vertical antenna is used. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:21 PM, An He wrote: > Hi, > > I am sure someone has tried to find out the maximum transmission distance > using USRP2. For example, I am interested in

[Discuss-gnuradio] On the maximum transmission distance

2010-06-29 Thread An He
Hi, I am sure someone has tried to find out the maximum transmission distance using USRP2. For example, I am interested in the maximum transmission range in the following setting: USRP2 with WBX, 400MHz/900MHz, outdoor, los, static, benchmark_tx/benchmark_rx with default except tx_gain=25 (maximu

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM with fft lenght 2048 and 4096 doesn't work

2010-06-21 Thread An He
could you try a smaller number of fft sub carriers (e.g., fft=128, occupied=80, cp=32, i/d=32)? usually this works better than an ofdm with a large number of carriers. this might be because the frequency offset of the radio becomes comparable to the bin size when the number of sub carriers is large