Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Hi all

2017-11-03 Thread Benny Alexandar
Hi Nirmala, Can you be more specific on what simulations you are planning to do with GNU radio ? There are plenty of tutorials available in net. -ben From: Discuss-gnuradio on behalf of Nirmala Soundararajan Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 2:50 AM To: Discuss

[Discuss-gnuradio] Hi all

2017-11-03 Thread Nirmala Soundararajan
I am new to gnu radio although I know some elementary stuff.. But first want to try only simulation without actually using the hardware. Request help thanks Nirmala ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Overlapping blocks and wires bug

2017-11-03 Thread Bakshi, Arjun
Done: https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/1511 Thank you, AB From: Andrej Rode Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 5:56:49 PM To: Bakshi, Arjun Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Overlapping blocks and wires bug Hi, On Wed, Nov 0

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Overlapping blocks and wires bug

2017-11-03 Thread Andrej Rode
Hi, On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:55:11PM +, Bakshi, Arjun wrote: > Not sure if this is the right place, but a couple of annoying behaviors of > GRC. > > > Often times when one adds a block to the flowgraph in GR, it'll go over a > wire or under another block. > > > When it goes over a wir

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio OOT Modules with Same Name - What To Do?

2017-11-03 Thread Kyeong Su Shin
Hello Nicolas, It is a GNU Radio module that I saw from GRCon17: https://github.com/samwhiting/gnuradio-doa/tree/master/gr-doa Regards, Kyeong Su Shin On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Nicolas Cuervo wrote: > Hi Kyeong, > > I see only one gr-doa around [1]. Could you point out which other > impl

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio OOT Modules with Same Name - What To Do?

2017-11-03 Thread Nicolas Cuervo
Hi Kyeong, I see only one gr-doa around [1]. Could you point out which other implementation is called gr-doa? I would agree that these conflicts would be better addressed properly instead of hacky approaches. Regards, - Nicolas [1]https://github.com/EttusResearch/gr-doa On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] X310 with 2 WBX in full duplex

2017-11-03 Thread Michael Carosino
Hi, I don't believe you need to install Xilinx/vivado/etc - that's only needed if you want to create your own rfnoc blocks (like I did for the transmitter, but ideally you avoid this as its a lot of work!). You should simply need the UHD rfnoc_devel branch installed w/gnuradio and use the image d

[Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio OOT Modules with Same Name - What To Do?

2017-11-03 Thread Kyeong Su Shin
Hello All: I am trying to use some GNU Radio OOT modules, and found that there are GNU Radio OOT modules have name conflicts ('gr-doa'). In this case, what would be the proper way to resolve the conflict and install both modules? I can only think of hacky approaches. Regards, Kyeong Su Shin

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simple HDLC + PSK simulation

2017-11-03 Thread James Wanga
I placed a file sink after the constellation demodulator and discovered that it seems too many bits are being output. Should I be packing bits before I pass the modulator output to the HDLC framer? Thank you. James Wanga > On Oct 26, 2017, at 11:04 AM, James Wanga wrote: > > Hi All. > > Im

[Discuss-gnuradio] Questions on some formulas used in ofdm_frame_equalizer_vcvc_impl.cc

2017-11-03 Thread Frank Restuccia
Hi everybody, I was checking out the code of the OFDM Frame Equalizer block to see how we perform equalization on OFDM. Everything looks clear, however two formulas are a bit obscure to me (file is *ofdm_frame_equalizer_vcvc_impl.cc*): *1) Lines 146-153:* // Correct the frequency shift on

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Tag manipulation block

2017-11-03 Thread Marcus Müller
Hi Aaron, that's one of the limitations of the current scheduler: No, there's no chance to build such a block that doesn't copy. Best regards, Marcus On 2017-11-02 20:08, Aaron Swan wrote: Given the following flow-graph     Prev Block --> Tag Manipulation Block --> Next Block Is it possib