On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 09:34 +0500, Usman Haider wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Dennis Glatting
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:59 +0500, Usman Haider wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am currently building GNU Radio 3.7.10.1 on Beaglebone black
> > > running Debian 8.6. I have
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:59 +0500, Usman Haider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am currently building GNU Radio 3.7.10.1 on Beaglebone black
> > running Debian 8.6. I have disable some components for testing and
> > to speed up the process. Afte
Hi Marcus,
I tried to setup a cross-compile environment on a PC but was not able to do
so for BBB although I am able to do so for E310, thanks to people@ettus
for providing the SDK :). I am still learning how can I do it for BBB. But
at the same time I am trying to build GNU Radio, with some compo
Oh! Excellent. Never thought about this. So, basically we may want to develop
a read-only version of webgui in future. Let me see how can I add the webGui
block with QT. If it is not possible during GSoC, I think we can easily extend
the current structure to make it read-only and by using a extern
> If we see from the user perspective, why would someone need two displays ?
You're assuming it would be the same people ... or at the same time.
* I could use QT locally but still expose a web UI for people to
remotely see what I'm describing. The local Qt UI could be more
complete and just have
Hello Sylvain,
One thing that I find a bit weird in the proposal is to use a new "generate
option" webui.
For the qt/wx/... that makes more sense because :
(1) they're exclusive, you can't be both WX and QT, trying to link multiple
graphics framework in the same app is just not practical (possi
Hi,
One thing that I find a bit weird in the proposal is to use a new "generate
option" webui.
For the qt/wx/... that makes more sense because :
(1) they're exclusive, you can't be both WX and QT, trying to link
multiple graphics framework in the same app is just not practical
(possible).
(2)
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:59 +0500, Usman Haider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently building GNU Radio 3.7.10.1 on Beaglebone black
> running Debian 8.6. I have disable some components for testing and
> to speed up the process. After installing the dependencies when I run
> cmake I am getting followi
Hello all,
Thank you very much for the discussions and feedbacks. I will try to answer all
of them one-by-one.
Mail from Marcus: * said server has a REST API, i.e. ispolled from the client
only? Or can there
be pushing data from server -> client? What is the model you'd prefer? Your
proposal
Huh, that seems a bit *too* permissive – other users might thus have
modified freely a script that you run as your user!
On 21.03.2017 21:39, Naceur wrote:
> Thanks. I just circumvented it by getting rid of pip requirement and asking
> the recipe to get the deb/rpm requirements instead.
> FYI, my
Hello GR,
Are there any grc flowgraphs showing use of looped USRP Source/Sink for
examples if in the middle of some flowgraphs I needed to re-tune the Radio.
I just saw in the corresponding grc blocks "command" port but I don't know
what are they expecting.
Regards,
Naceur
--
View this messag
Thanks. I just circumvented it by getting rid of pip requirement and asking
the recipe to get the deb/rpm requirements instead.
FYI, my /home/nae/.local/bin/pip was already allowed 777.
Regards,
Naceur
--
View this message in context:
http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/installing-a-python-package
I have figured it out myself.
The length tag key in the Head Payload Demux block must match the key value
in the header. In my case, it is "payload symbols".
--
View this message in context:
http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/no-payload-length-passed-from-header-data-tp63160p63228.html
Sent fro
Personal two cents: On most modern linuxes, you shouldn't be installing
mako via pip, and much less even numpy (because that's a huge compile
including fortran interfaces).
I just go and remove pip from the list of preferred packagers on my
systems¹. Never ran into problems with that. Now, I've ne
Thank you for your reply. However, I don't want to have anything done
manually.
Maybe I need rephrasing my initial post:
It is not that I want PyBOMBS to to do a pip --user but I am more wondering
why it is saying:
> PyBOMBS.PackageManager - DEBUG - Using packager pip
> PyBOMBS.Packager.pip -
Awesome! Thanks, Dan!
-- M
On 03/21/2017 10:25 AM, Daniel P. Martin wrote:
> I will volunteer to do that! I've got a deadline this week keeping me
> very busy and then a week on vacation, so it may be two weeks before I
> get to it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 3/21/17 12:09 PM, Martin Braun
Also, the jessie-backports Debian Repo contains GNU Radio 3.7.10.1
(thanks Maitland!) and that is pretty current, so I don't really see a
reason to compile such a massive piece of software on the beaglebone.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 21.03.2017 19:21, Marcus Müller wrote:
>
> Hi Usman,
>
> so, is
Hi Usman,
so, is there anything wrong?
By the way, it's usually not a good idea to build software *on* an
embedded device itself; you'd typically try to get your software built
on a "proper" PC, because compiling C++ is a very RAM and disk IO
intense operation, and takes O(forever) time on a Beag
Hi,
I am currently building GNU Radio 3.7.10.1 on Beaglebone black running
Debian 8.6. I have disable some components for testing and to speed up the
process. After installing the dependencies when I run cmake I am getting
following messages. Are these messages okay? Do I have to pass any flags t
Hi Ben,
thanks a lot for your helpful advice!
Most typos should be fixed by now and I am going to add the paragraph
breaks.
The chapter "Deliverable Features" - you are right - does not clearly
separate the deliverables from the existing stuff.
I am going to improve that.
Thanks again! I
Hi
I am currently building GNU Radio 3.7.10.0 on Beaglebone black. When I run
cmake I am getting
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Hi Marcus,
Yes, we had long discussions and I had discussion
with Fons separately as well.
I tried to implement his paper
http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/papers/adapt-resamp.pdf
on an embedded platform to quickly check the behavior as
well, were I can adjust the audio sample rate in hardware.
Hi Julian,
in the future, please try to keep your questions on the mailing lists,
so that it's not like only one person can contribute experience.
In your case, maybe the discuss-gnuradio mailing list would be
interesting, sign up is under [1]. You'll find an archive there that
also answers your
Hi Moritz -
Nice work! I'm really happy to see this proposal. A few notes:
* If you plan on integrating any other software into your work, please
specifically call out its license.
* As Martin said, it would be good to fix some of the typos. Also, please
add a paragraph break (either an indent or
I will volunteer to do that! I've got a deadline this week keeping me
very busy and then a week on vacation, so it may be two weeks before I
get to it.
Regards,
Dan
On 3/21/17 12:09 PM, Martin Braun wrote:
Dan,
would you like to add the info the wiki? Maybe onto the FAQ?
-- M
On 03/20/20
>
> Only reason, I am resistant to the idea of not using the Bokeh server is
> that the existing features and scope of the project will be reduced. Since,
> all the plots and widgets are necessary in order to make the module usable,
> limiting the plots will not be good enough. Although I am open t
I posted this last year, but didn’t really have any takers, so I thought
I’d try again and increase the pay.
I have a project that requires a gnu radio receiver that can receive,
demodulate, and decode BPSK and QPSK data coming from a satellite modem.
The modem also has FEC that will need to be ha
Hello,
good to see so much feedback to this proposal. This feature is clearly
something that we all want to see become reality!
I have discussed this idea with Kartik beforehand offline and I am glad
to see all of you have the same issues/objections.
While bokeh (and plotly) were mentioned in the
Dan,
would you like to add the info the wiki? Maybe onto the FAQ?
-- M
On 03/20/2017 01:46 AM, Daniel P. Martin wrote:
> I found the answer to this post in the discuss-gnuradio archive. The
> answer was posted by Patrick Sathyanathan:
>
> [Discuss-gnuradio] OOT Module Attribute Error module obj
The answer would be virtualenvs, but virtualenvs are not fully supported
in PyBOMBS. You might be able to to this by hand, but I've never tried it:
- Create a prefix using the --virtualenv switch
- Manually pip install the package into the virtualenv
- Maybe you need to manually set the package as
Hi Kartik,
thanks for the feedback!
so, I took the time and tried to read up a bit on what Bokeh does, how
it's partitioned. I'd like to describe this here as shortly as possible,
mostly for my own understanding and to foster more discussion with
others that can't find the time, and would kindly
Hi Mehmeto,
On 21.03.2017 10:24, Mehmeto wrote:
> Dera All,
> In almost all cases the Viterbi decoder block eats a lot of CPU time.
True, but only for higher rates. But yeah, channel coding is a major CPU
load, always.
> The
> best alternative is a GPU solution.
That *is* a bold claim. Note tha
What data rates are you working at? I haven't had so much trouble with
Viterbi being a limiting factor up to about 1 Mbps QPSK with concatenated
coding.
Sadly, I have no experience moving this to GPU.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:25 AM Mehmeto wrote:
> Dera All,
> In almost all cases the Viterbi
Bah, I messed up my filter designs in that last flowgraph.
(Transition BW != Stopband Freq).
Never drink beer while designing filters. :)
See the attached, fixed flowgraph (v4).
-Andy
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> Hi Dirk:
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Dirk Gorisse
Dear Ben and Bastian,
Thank you very much for the feedback.
@Ben: Thank you for this error. I have not tried to dig deep in this error
because it was just a prototype.
@Bastian: You got the server architecture correct. I am planning to do exactly
same.
Coming to queries about using Bokeh:I agree th
Dera All,
In almost all cases the Viterbi decoder block eats a lot of CPU time. The
best alternative is a GPU solution. I have searched for an open source GPU
implementation but could not find one. There is a MATLAB implementation but
that one is far from open source.
Any Ideas? Is it easy to port
36 matches
Mail list logo