Hi Sebastian,
I am not quite sure, what you mean by "running GRC from source". Do you
mean build it from source? I am using pybombs and I think this is
cloning the master branch. To test this, I would need the maint branch,
correct? Or is it already merged into the master branch?
Best regards,
Mi
The result I just posted was without executing the set_auto_dc_offset(false)
command . I have not tested with this command yet!
cheers.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Marcus Müller
wrote:
> Yes! Wasn't this the result of you trying thatß
>
> On 01.11.2016 18:37, Roohollah Parvizi wrote:
>
>
Well, then: Try!
Seriously, though, why are you getting confirmation for something that
you can easily do? I think one of the strengths of open source software
is that it doesn't cost you anything to just go ahead and experiment.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 01.11.2016 19:00, Roohollah Parvizi wrot
Yes! Wasn't this the result of you trying thatß
On 01.11.2016 18:37, Roohollah Parvizi wrote:
> Hello everyone--
>
> I want to know how to disable the DC offset. If I execute
> the set_auto_dc_offset(false) command it will work ?
>
> Regards,
>
> RP
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Rooho
Hello everyone--
I want to know how to disable the DC offset. If I execute the
set_auto_dc_offset(false)
command it will work ?
Regards,
RP
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Roohollah Parvizi
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I am actually new in this area. it happens
> around18th sample
This sounds like you're abusing the function probe - if you want to
generate a stream of samples at such a rate, give your block an
(optional) output. Or, if you want your block to be able to inform other
blocks of changes (which, I'd say, probably makes a lot more sense than
polling a function), g
Hi Marcus,
Adding virtual method in the include/*.h has solved the run-time error.
However, I have noticed that function probe does not call the function
"*poll_complex_gain*". I verified this by using two methods 1) Adding
/printf/ in the function poll_complex_gain() 2) by adding WX GUI Static
Hi Sylvain,
"insane" is a relative term (and we're talking about things that /I'd/
do, so the reference insanity level is a bit raised to begin with). I
just tried this with
null source (complex, vlen = 100*1024*1024/8) -> null sink
and asked "ipcs" about what happened. GNU Radio created exactl
Hi,
> You could write a python block that takes input which is a vector
> of 100*1024*1024B/(8B/sample) = 13107200 complex numbers, and directly
> writes each input to an own file using numpy. You can convert a stream
> of (single) samples to a stream of vectors of that size using a
> stream_to_ve
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for your reply. The solution you suggested worked well.
Regards,
Kunal Sankhe
--
View this message in context:
http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/Error-in-using-Accessor-method-in-GNU-Radio-3-7-AttributeError-Object-has-no-attribute-tp61855p61860.html
Sent from the GnuRadio mai
While writing a custom block would give you some valuable experience, there are
some other options.
1) You may be able to use some combination of the tag strobe block [1] together
with the tagged file sink [2]. I'm thinking you could have two tag strobe
blocks, one for the "burst" TRUE, and on
I am a beginner in Python, I will see this tutorial. Thank you so much
Marcus.
Best regards,
Pablo
--
View this message in context:
http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/Question-about-GNURADIO-File-sink-tp61841p61858.html
Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo
