That makes complete sense. Thanks for the suggestion!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Kevin Reid wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Pavan Yedavalli
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe the Head block is a good option - it looks like I should put that
>> in between the complex_to_mag and the file_sink bloc
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Pavan Yedavalli
wrote:
> Maybe the Head block is a good option - it looks like I should put that in
> between the complex_to_mag and the file_sink blocks, right?
>
You can put it anywhere as long as you understand how much data is flowing
through that point and ad
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for getting back to me. I guess that makes sense. The only thing I
was planning to use was the scipy.fromfile() function, in hopes that it
would read out the binary data into a 1024-point vector, but I guess that
was the wrong assumption.
Maybe the Head block is a good option - i
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Pavan Yedavalli
wrote:
> My current flowgraph consists of a signal source (cosine) ->
> stream_to_vector of size 1024 -> forward FFT of size 1024 -> complex_to_mag
> of size 1024 -> file sink of size 1024 (unbuffered OFF and append set to
> overwrite).
>
> After I
On 09/08/2016 09:34 PM, Pavan Yedavalli wrote:
Hi,
This is probably a very simple question, but I have an issue when I am
using the file sink. My current flowgraph consists of a signal source
(cosine) -> stream_to_vector of size 1024 -> forward FFT of size 1024
-> complex_to_mag of size 1024
Hi,
This is probably a very simple question, but I have an issue when I am
using the file sink. My current flowgraph consists of a signal source
(cosine) -> stream_to_vector of size 1024 -> forward FFT of size 1024 ->
complex_to_mag of size 1024 -> file sink of size 1024 (unbuffered OFF and
append
Thank you very much Luca. I understood it very well.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Luca Pascale wrote:
> Hi Samith,
> I suppose as noise source you can use something like
> http://www.noisecom.com/products/components/nc520-low-
> voltage-surface-mount-noise-source-200-khz-to-5-ghz
> or similar
Thanks, that is what I was looking for. I'll try it soon.
--
Usman
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Nathan West-GR
wrote:
> There's some terminology that was ambiguous and/or wrong in the initial
> email, and the command to do this is not well known and still fairly new.
>
> See http://gnuradi
There's some terminology that was ambiguous and/or wrong in the initial
email, and the command to do this is not well known and still fairly new.
See http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/page_uhd.html#uhd_command_syntax and
https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/blob/master/gr-uhd/lib/usrp_source_impl.cc
Hi Usman,
what information do you want these tags to contain?
Generally, this is not how the USRP source is supposed to work; tags are
only added on certain events.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 09/08/2016 07:30 PM, Usman Haider wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Sorry for being not clear. USRP source add tag
Hi Marcus,
Sorry for being not clear. USRP source add tags on the first sample when
the flowgraph starts. What can I do if I want USRP source to add tags again
on any sample while the flowgraph is running? I read somewhere that there
is a command for this but I do not remember. I am using N210 and
Hello all,
I am trying to design a full duplex operation on my USRP3. I have to use OFDM
and a defined TDMA scheme for different OFDM symbols. I also have to use a
preamble, but it has to be sent once every TDMA frame. I have designed a block
which takes care of my TDMA and preamble implementa
12 matches
Mail list logo
