Just pass the sptr. That's safe. That's its purpose.
M
On 06/10/2016 04:44 AM, Santos Campos wrote:
> Pretty close! I was hoping to make a kind of usrp sink to control the
> board remotely.
> [usrp source] -> (demodulate signal to a 0/1) -> [custom block to mux
> gpio ports]
>
> So I'm familiar
Olivier,
the link you gave us does not work.
It says:
"
*That file isn’t here anymore *
Someone might’ve deleted the file or disabled the link
"
Achilleas
PS: I attach here a simple simulation grc file for you to "play" with.
If you are not clear about it there is no point going on with more
co
Hey Olivier,
I hoped you pulled that file back off quickly. By publicly posting the
file and password you violated the crap out of the license agreement to
RTCA and linked your name to the act.
Mark
*From*: Olivier Goyette
*Subject*: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] CPFSK mod/demod + strange behavio
Hello Olivier,
I'm also pretty useless on GNUradio, I'm a hardware guy.
However, I did get simulations going in Matlab/Simulink for a few
variations of the UAT Rx/Tx. Let me say that this is not a channel for the
faint of heart. The dump978 code manages to do a Rx with marvelous
simplicity. I
As promised, I'm giving the documentation I talked about yesterday and hop
it will clarify some of the things we discussed earlier.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1blrausidm66tg4/DO-282B%20with%20Corrigendum%201_bx87er.pdf?dl=0
the password is bx87er
on page 23, you will find what the transmission sp
Hi all,
like every week I want to give a short update about my GSoC project. For
details, check the blog post at
https://grinspector.wordpress.com/2016/06/10/week-3-separation-issues/
Most of the week was used to debug the Signal Separator block, which did
not pass my QA test. In consultation wit
Olivier,
can you point EXACTLY at the reference (page no, etc so we don't have to
search)
where it requires an RRC after the CPFSK and an RRC at the input of the
receiver.
Achilleas
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Achilleas Anastasopoulos
wrote:
> Why are you using the RRC filters?
>
> I hope
Marcus,
any PAM signal with symbol rate R can be transmitted using bandwidth R/2
(essentially a sinc pulse; this is the case when you put 0 as the
roll-off factor of an RRC).
I thought your comment was not specifically for CPFSK,
but general transmission schemes thus my clarification.
If it is
Hi,
update on this topic: I figured out that passing the parent does not seem
to be the problem. The important lines are in the tag of the XML
file, which result in the python flowgraph to:
> self.inspector_qtgui_sink_vf_0 = inspector.qtgui_inspector_sink_vf(4096)
> self._inspector_qtgui_sink_vf
Pretty close! I was hoping to make a kind of usrp sink to control the board
remotely.
[usrp source] -> (demodulate signal to a 0/1) -> [custom block to mux gpio
ports]
So I'm familiar with pass by reference for functions and how to use them
after.
I'm not sure what it means to PbR into a whole blo
Hi everyone,
I am replicating the fll bandedge block code to my oot module. It seems
that whenever I call the constructor of the control_loop I get the
following error
gr-wsync1/lib/freqtime_sync1_impl.cc:61:77: error: type
‘gr::blocks::control_loop’ is not a direct or virtual base of
‘gr::wsync1
Hi Olivier,
On 10.06.2016 03:06, Olivier Goyette wrote:
> Excuse me for not understanding everything, but there seem to be a
> lack of comprehension coming from me.
>
> 1- Where is your "625 kHz" coming from ?
2x312.5kHz, your FSK deviation, and what looks like to be about your
filter bandwidth!
>
Hi Dave,
if you need a block that just passes messages, try the Message Strobe. If
this is not what you want, can you please publish your block code so we can
reproduce the behaivour? From your error message, maybe you have forgotten
to put the "self" parameter in the method declaration? That is a
13 matches
Mail list logo
