Hello Discuss list this is Lee M here.
I am looking for a suggestion of the best version of the boost library
that compiles and links on a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04 computer with the
current stable version of gnuradio.
I seem to be seeing a name interpretation problem.
During
Hello Discuss list this is Lee M here.
I am looking for a suggestion of the best version of the boost library
that compiles and links on a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04 computer with the
current stable version of gnuradio.
I seem to be seeing a name interpretation problem.
During
Hello Discuss list this is Lee M here.
I am looking for a suggestion of the best version of the boost library
that compiles and links on a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04 computer with the
current stable version of gnuradio.
I seem to be seeing a name interpretation problem.
During
If you just make any signal source and a QT GUI Sink, you'll see that the
frequency scale is wrong: a 32ksps signal will show a frequency range from
-8kHz to +8kHz (instead of -16...16kHz).
Also, if you keep the default FFT size of 1024, the chooser widget shows
256, but in reality the FFT size is
Just FYI, trying to compile a controlport client using the embedded
version of Ice (IceE) gives an error
slice2cppe gnuradio.ice
gnuradio.ice:72: Struct data member `min' cannot be a value object.
gnuradio.ice:73: Struct data member `max' cannot be a value object.
gnuradio.ice:74: Struct data memb
Hi Bastian,
Thanks for your reply.
In fact what you suggested was exactly the case. I had an old gnuradio
installation before having an ubuntu upgrade. So by manually deleting the
old files problem was solved.
--Alex
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Bastian Bloessl wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>
> On
Hi list,
I have ported some code from Gnuradio-3.2.2 version to most recent
UHD-based 3.6.4 version and I was trying to check the functionality of my
ported code by comparing the output of its every block versus the old code
one by one. Some of the blocks I've used in Python are written in C++ and
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:43:08PM -0400, Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote:
> OK please scratch that out.
> I had a minor problem with scipy.
> Once it was reinstalled everything was fine.
You could have written before I lost a night's sleep :)
Just kidding. Glad it works.
MB
--
Karlsruhe Instit
