Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] WX GUI FFT Sink Performance

2013-05-15 Thread Mark McCarron
Marcus, Sorry for the late reply on this, I've been upgrading my hardware and I'm just catching up. Here is my issue, in Spectrum lab if I provide a FFT Input length of 65536 on a 192Ksps stream, I get the following characteristics: Effect of FFT settings with fs= 192.000 kHz: Width of one FFT

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NOAA antenna

2013-05-15 Thread Patrik Tast
Hi Here is the 137 MHz RHCP antenna we have developed http://www.poes-weather.com/download/jm-dca/ This antenna will give you better performance at low satellite elevations (horizons). It is easy to build and you don't have to be that careful. We don't use a pre-amp if coax < 15 m (loss ~2 dB RG

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Troubled by the pfb channelizer center frequency location

2013-05-15 Thread LD Zhang
I guess I got it! The default channel map is such that the first channel is the UN-fftshifted frequency location which is at 10 Hz (the 5th one on the list)! Whoo! It would be nice to tell a newcomer about this. LD From: LD Zhang [mailto:ldz10...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:

[Discuss-gnuradio] Troubled by the pfb channelizer center frequency location

2013-05-15 Thread LD Zhang
Dear Group, I am learning to do the pfb channelizer using the now famous example on the documentation page at: http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/page_pfb.html The example is at the end of the page, where a 9-subchannels are pulled out of the original 9 kHz bandwidth signal. The original signals' t

[Discuss-gnuradio] Upcoming GNURadio Conferences in USA?

2013-05-15 Thread Eric Cottrell
Hello, I got an email from Ettus Research and noticed there is an SDR Conference near me in Worchester, MA (NEWSDR’13). Unfortunate for me, it is this Friday so I can not get food or parking because I cannot preregister (link gives an error). I remember there was a GNU Radio conference in the f

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread Josh Blum
> > Yes, that would be fab. > > I > would caution that because VITA-49 doesn't actually specify any > encapsulation mechanisms for any higher-layer protocols, there's no > "standard" way of placing VITA-49 over TCP and UDP, it is necessarily > proprietary. > > It would be much better if there

[Discuss-gnuradio] Regarding on the new OFDM implementation.

2013-05-15 Thread Alex Zhang
Hi, It is excited to see the new OFDM implementation has been merged and test in the GNURadio master branch. Several Questions: 1. What are the main changes from the old design? 2. Seems it support NC-OFDM as the user can arrange the carriers? And how is the gain of dB between the occupied carrier

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] where is gnuradio-examples/python/pfb?

2013-05-15 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:15 AM, LD Zhang wrote: > I find the example at the online page > http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/page_pfb.html very helpful (code at the end > of the page). It runs and generates nice plots. Still trying to get used to > it. Great! > But the code at gr-filter/python/pf

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-ctrlport and multiple applications

2013-05-15 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alexandru Csete wrote: > Greetings, > > Today, we can configure gr-ctrlport to use a specific port. Doing so > leads to a problem when trying to execute more than one gnuradio > application even if they are not explicitly using controlport. The > first application

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NOAA antenna

2013-05-15 Thread John Coppens
On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:29:59 -0400 "Marcus D. Leech" wrote: > I think a lot of people use a QFH antenna, or a turnstile antenna for > NOAA satellites at 137Mhz. Note that you will almost certainly need an antenna amplifier too (unless you make a huge antenna ;) Even a specialized receiver needs

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Status of GSoC?

2013-05-15 Thread Jens Elsner
Am 15.05.2013 17:13, schrieb karimkhan: Can we know the status of GSoC applications? Do we need to take any action meanwhile? See Martin's email last week. J ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li

[Discuss-gnuradio] Status of GSoC?

2013-05-15 Thread karimkhan
Can we know the status of GSoC applications? Do we need to take any action meanwhile?___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread Charlie Starling
It's a Narda Remote Spectrum Analyzer - NRA On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian Padalino wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Charlie Starling wrote: > >> Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP >> or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching aroun

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread mleech
On 15 May 2013 10:44, Martin Braun (CEL) wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:36:46AM -0400, mleech@ripnet.comwrote: > >> On 15 May 2013 10:20, Charlie Starling wrote: Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching aro

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread Brian Padalino
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Charlie Starling wrote: > Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP > or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching around looking for a way > to interface this into gnuradio but all the information I can seem to find > regarding

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread Martin Braun (CEL)
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:36:46AM -0400, mle...@ripnet.com wrote: > On 15 May 2013 10:20, Charlie Starling wrote: > > Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP > or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching around looking for a way > to interface th

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread mleech
On 15 May 2013 10:20, Charlie Starling wrote: > Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching around looking for a way to interface this into gnuradio but all the information I can seem to find regarding VITA49 seems

[Discuss-gnuradio] VITA49 - VRT Output from spectrum analyser

2013-05-15 Thread Charlie Starling
Hi all, I have a spectrum analyser that outputs its I and Q data over TCP or UDP in the VITA49 format, I've been searching around looking for a way to interface this into gnuradio but all the information I can seem to find regarding VITA49 seems to be with reference to USRP. Can anyone offer any ad

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] NOAA antenna

2013-05-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Hi all, I want to play with NOAA...Is there anyone here who has already tried it? Can someone reccomend me an antenna with acceptable performance, which is not difficult to build? I have an ezcap tuner. Thank you, Marco Ribero ___ Discuss-gnuradio mail

[Discuss-gnuradio] NOAA antenna

2013-05-15 Thread 2_...@libero.it
Hi all, I want to play with NOAA...Is there anyone here who has already tried it? Can someone reccomend me an antenna with acceptable performance, which is not difficult to build? I have an ezcap tuner. Thank you, Marco Ribero ___ Discuss-gnuradio mai

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New Module/block call issue: make function??

2013-05-15 Thread Nada ABDELKADER
Thank you for your help, it works now. Reagrds, Nada Tom Rondeau a écrit : On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Nada ABDELKADER wrote: Hi, I've added a module 'sensingmod' with a "noblock" block 'sensing' but when I tried to call the block from python, I got this error: Traceback (most recen

[Discuss-gnuradio] gr-ctrlport and multiple applications

2013-05-15 Thread Alexandru Csete
Greetings, Today, we can configure gr-ctrlport to use a specific port. Doing so leads to a problem when trying to execute more than one gnuradio application even if they are not explicitly using controlport. The first application will take control of the network socket and the second will fail to