Has anyone look at the way sdrsharp does automatic I/Q balance correction?
It seems to iterate over an FFT, looking to maximize the difference
between bins and their images. But that badly fails when the *incoming
signal*
has symmetric spectral features--the algorithm could badly screw up
a
To support GFSK modulations, a higher modulation index needs to be used.
MSK is defined as a fixed modulation index of 0.25.
However, GFSK is used in many simple ISM (unlicensed) systems, where the
modulation index can vary from 0.5 to 2.0 typically.So, I would ask how
the existing digital FM
Sorry, I goofed - misread the question.
My reply refers to an oscilloscope sink, not FFT.
Hugh Pett
On 03/04/2012 9:25 AM, mario behn wrote:
Hi,
I'm using gnuradio-companion and in it the FFT-Sink and wonder if there
is an easy way to change the ploting color for the shown data from blue to re
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 16:04, Stefan Ott wrote:
>
> Yup, seems your changes helped! Just FYI, the situation doesn't change
> regardless of whether I use uhd 3.3.2, 3.4.0, git master or git next.
> I'll try to have a closer look at the ioctls (I'm not particularly
> good / experienced at this) to s
Hi,
I am having a hard time with a "segmentation fault" error. I am no expert in
python (I just started to use it last week) but I find it difficult to
believe that a segmentation fault error would appear in python code.
However, I am not using any block made by me.
So this is the part of my cod
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 15:36, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 05:24 AM, Stefan Ott wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:12, Stefan Ott wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah thanks. I just built a new kernel using that patch (i.e. from the
>>> e100-3.0-pm-2-bugfixes branch). I hope that was the right one, the
>
On 04/04/2012 05:24 AM, Stefan Ott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:12, Stefan Ott wrote:
>>
>> Ah thanks. I just built a new kernel using that patch (i.e. from the
>> e100-3.0-pm-2-bugfixes branch). I hope that was the right one, the
>> usrp_e driver looks ok but is only at version 0.2 as oppos
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:12, Stefan Ott wrote:
>
> Ah thanks. I just built a new kernel using that patch (i.e. from the
> e100-3.0-pm-2-bugfixes branch). I hope that was the right one, the
> usrp_e driver looks ok but is only at version 0.2 as opposed to the
> one from the e100-3.0-pm-2-fixes-fro
